[2024] KEELC 798 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had already obtained a judgment for eviction and permanent injunction against the defendant, which had not been appealed, set aside, or otherwise challenged. The defendant had failed to comply with the judgment by not vacating the suit property or removing the offending structures....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 798 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jane Muthini Matiliku; Defendant: Veronicah Makau
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 71 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Enforcement Application Post Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed in full.
- Judges
- TW Murigi
- Legal Topics
- Eviction Orders, Permanent Injunctions, Enforcement of Judgments, Land Encroachment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Muthini Matiliku
Plaintiff
Veronicah Makau
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Enforcement Application Post Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to enforcement of the eviction order against the defendant.
- 2 Whether the Officer Commanding Police Station should be directed to provide security for enforcement of the eviction.
- 3 Whether the defendant should bear the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had already obtained a judgment for eviction and permanent injunction against the defendant, which had not been appealed, set aside, or otherwise challenged. The defendant had failed to comply with the judgment by not vacating the suit property or removing the offending structures. The court held that the applicant was entitled to the fruits of her judgment and that enforcement measures, including police assistance, were warranted to ensure compliance. The absence of any response or opposition from the defendant further justified granting the orders sought. The court therefore allowed the application, directing the Officer Commanding Police Station to...
Court Disposition
Application allowed in full.
Orders
- The Officer Commanding Police Station (OCS) Mukuyuni Police Station is directed to provide security to enforce the eviction orders issued on 23rd March 2022, compelling the defendant to remove the offending structures from parcel Ukia/Utaati/159.
- The defendant/respondent shall bear the costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Matiliku v Makau (Environment & Land Case 71 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 798 (KLR) (14 February 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 798 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Makueni
Environment & Land Case 71 of 2019
TW Murigi, J
February 14, 2024
Between
Jane Muthini Matiliku
Plaintiff
and
Veronicah Makau
Defendant
Ruling
1. Before me for determination is the Notice Motion dated 6th June, 2023 brought under Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 63 of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 40 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 and all other enabling provisions of the law in which the Applicant seeks the following orders: -1. Spent.2. That this Honourable Court be pleased to direct the Officer Commanding Police Station (OCS) Mukuyuni Police Station to provide security to enforce the orders of eviction issued by this Honourable Court on 29th August, 2022 against the Defendant to evict and compel her to remove the offending structures that have encroached on the Plaintiff’s parcel of land Number Ukia/Utaati/159. 3.That the Defendant/Respondent be ordered to pay for the costs of the auctioneer.
2. The application is premised on the grounds appearing on its face together with the supporting affidavit of Jane Muthini Matiliku sworn on even date.
The Applicant’s Case 3. The Applicant averred that the court in its judgment delivered on 23/03/2022 issued an order of eviction against the Defendant compelling her to remove the offending structures from land parcel No. Ukia/Utaati/159. She further averred that no appeal has been lodged against the said judgment.
4. The Applicant argued that she will suffer irreparable loss if the orders sought are not granted since the Defendant is still encroaching and building structures on the suit property.
5. Though duly served, the Respondent did not file any response to the application.
Analysis And Determination 6. Having considered the application in light of the pleadings, the only issue that arises for determination is whether the Applicant is entitled to the orders sought.
7. The Plaintiff instituted this suit vide a Plaint dated 19th September, 2019 and sought the following orders against the Defendant: -i.An order of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from encroaching or in any other manner interfering with the Plaintiff’s land parcel number Ukia/utaati/159. ii.An order of eviction against the Defendant compelling her to remove the offending structures that have encroached into the Plaintiff’s land parcel number Ukia/utaati/159. iii.Costs of this suit.
8. The Defendant did not enter appearance or file a Defence within the stipulated time. Interlocutory judgment was entered on 8th October, 2021.
9. This matter proceeded for hearing as undefended on 17th November, 2021 and thereafter, Judgment was delivered on 23rd March, 2022 in the following terms:-a.An order of permanent injunction be and is hereby issued restraining the Defendant from encroaching or in any other manner interfering with the Plaintiff’s land parcel number Ukia/utaati/159. b.An order of eviction be and is hereby issued against the Defendant compelling her to remove the offending structures that have encroached into the Plaintiff’s parcel of land number Ukia/utaati/159. c.The Plaintiff is awarded costs of the suit.
10. There is already a judgment in favour of the Applicant and it appears that the Respondent has not adhered to the terms of the judgment.
11. The judgment delivered on 23rd March, 2022 has neither been set aside nor challenged in any forum. It is clear that since the judgment was delivered on 23rd March 2022 and a decree extracted on 25th April 2023, the Respondent has not given the Applicant vacant possession of the suit property. This court finds and holds that the Applicant is entitled to the fruits of her judgment.
12. The upshot of the foregoing is that the application dated 6th June, 2023 is merited and the same is allowed in the following terms:-i.The Officer Commanding Police Station(OCS) Mukuyuni Police Station is hereby directed to provide security to enforce orders of eviction issued by this court on 23rd March 2022 compelling the Defendant to remove the offending structures that have encroached into the Plaintiff’s parcel of land No. Ukia/Utaati/159ii.The Defendant/Respondent to bear the costs of this application
……………………………………………HON. T. MURIGIJUDGERULING SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS COURT THIS 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024. IN THE PRESENCE OF: -Court Assistant – Mr. Kwemboi.Kithuka for the Applicant.