[2025] KEELC 3162 (KLR)
The court found that, although the truth of the plaintiffs' allegations could not be determined at the interlocutory stage, it was necessary to preserve the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the main suit. The application was unopposed, and the plaintiffs had demonstrated sufficient grounds for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 3162 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kaunda Matoke; Plaintiff: Kephas Matoke; Defendant: Daniel Oguta Matoke; Defendant: Land Registrar, Kisii; Defendant: The Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E007 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Inhibition Application
- Outcome
- interlocutory injunction and inhibition granted; costs in the cause
- Judges
- M Sila
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Inhibition Orders, Fraudulent Land Transfer, Rectification of Register
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kaunda Matoke
Plaintiff
Kephas Matoke
Plaintiff
Daniel Oguta Matoke
Defendant
Land Registrar, Kisii
Defendant
The Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Inhibition Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case to warrant an injunction restraining the 1st defendant from dealing with the suit land.
- 2 Whether an order of inhibition should issue to preserve the subject matter pending hearing and determination of the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although the truth of the plaintiffs' allegations could not be determined at the interlocutory stage, it was necessary to preserve the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the main suit. The application was unopposed, and the plaintiffs had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an inhibition and an injunction to maintain the status quo. The orders sought were therefore granted to prevent any dealings with the land parcel Bassi/Bondonya/794 until the case is concluded.
Court Disposition
interlocutory injunction and inhibition granted; costs in the cause
Orders
- An order of inhibition is issued prohibiting the registration of any disposition in the register of land parcel Bassi/Bondonya/794.
- The 1st defendant is barred by injunction from selling, charging, leasing, or otherwise dealing with land parcel Bassi/Bondonya/794.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Matoke & another v Matoke & 2 others (Environment & Land Case E007 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 3162 (KLR) (3 April 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 3162 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kisii
Environment & Land Case E007 of 2025
M Sila, J
April 3, 2025
Between
Kaunda Matoke
1st Plaintiff
Kephas Matoke
2nd Plaintiff
and
Daniel Oguta Matoke
1st Defendant
Land Registrar, Kisii
2nd Defendant
The Attorney General
3rd Defendant
Ruling
1. The application before me is that dated 17 February 2025 filed by the plaintiffs contemporaneously with the plaint. The substantive prayers sought is for injunction to restrain the 1st defendant/respondent from dealing with the land parcel Bassi/Bondonya/794 (the suit land) and for an order of inhibition to prohibit the registration of any disposition in the register of the suit land.
2. Despite being served, the 1st respondent is yet to enter appearance and he has not filed anything to oppose the motion.
3. I have gone through the plaint, the application and the supporting affidavit. The plaintiffs file this suit as legal representative of Sarah Kerubo Matoke (deceased) who died in 2007. They aver that the deceased was registered as the proprietor of the suit land. They contend that the 1st respondent caused himself to be fraudulently registered as proprietor of the suit land. In the plaint, they inter alia seek orders for a declaration that the transfer to the 1st defendant is null and void and they seek an order of rectification of the register so that it reflects the name of the deceased as proprietor.
4. As I have stated the application is unopposed. At this point in time, I cannot tell whether the allegations of the applicants is true or not. That will need to await the hearing of the case. It is however necessary that the subject matter of the case be preserved. For that reason, I am prepared to allow the application in so far as it seeks to preserve the subject matter of the litigation pending hearing and determination of the case.
5. I therefore order as follows :1. That there is hereby issued an order of inhibition prohibiting the registration of any disposition in the register of the land parcel Bassi/Bondonya/794. 2.That the 1st defendant/respondent is hereby barred by an order of injunction from selling, charging, leasing, or in any other way entering into any dealings in regard to the land parcel Bassi/Bondonya/794. 3.That the status quo prevailing with regard to possession and occupation of the land parcel Bassi/Bondonya/794 be maintained until the conclusion of the case.4. That the costs of this application will be costs in the cause.
6. It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025JUSTICE MUNYAO SILAJUDGE, ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURTAT KISIIDelivered in the presence of :Ms. Kivindu for the plaintiffs/applicantsMs. Osebe for the 2nd & 3rd defendants/respondentsN/A for the 1st defendant/respondentCourt Assistant – Michael Oyuko