[2022] KEELRC 4081 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 4081 (KLR)

The court found that it could not proceed to rule on the contempt application without clear communication and confirmation regarding the existence and status of a stay of execution order allegedly issued by the Court of Appeal. The presence of such an order, if confirmed, would have a direct bearing on whether the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 4081 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Emmy Amwayi Mattakwa; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1395 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Ruling on Application for Contempt Deferred Pending Clarification on Stay Order
Outcome
Ruling on contempt application deferred.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Stay of Execution, Enforcement of Judgment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Contempt of Court Stay of Execution Enforcement of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emmy Amwayi Mattakwa

Applicant

Kenya Revenue Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt Application / Ruling on Application for Contempt Deferred Pending Clarification on Stay Order

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is in contempt of court for failing to comply with the judgment delivered on March 31, 2022.
  2. 2 Whether the existence of a stay of execution order from the Court of Appeal affects the contempt application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that it could not proceed to rule on the contempt application without clear communication and confirmation regarding the existence and status of a stay of execution order allegedly issued by the Court of Appeal. The presence of such an order, if confirmed, would have a direct bearing on whether the respondent could be held in contempt for non-compliance with the judgment. Accordingly, the court deferred its ruling until the parties provide clarification on the status of the Court of Appeal proceedings and the alleged stay order.

Court Disposition

Ruling on contempt application deferred.

Orders

  • Ruling on the application dated May 19, 2022 is deferred pending clarification from the parties on the presence of an order of stay of execution alleged to have been issued by the Court of Appeal.
  • The parties shall move the court upon such clarification.