[2021] KEHC 5516 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5516 (KLR)

The court found that the respondents had been duly served with the mention date as previously directed, but had not filed any response to the application. In the interests of justice and to preserve the subject matter of the appeal, the court exercised its discretion to extend the interim orders staying proceedings...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5516 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Matunda (Fruit) Bus Services Ltd; Appellant: David Obilu Onyundo; Respondent: Dennis Otieno Oriwo; Respondent: Marren Peter Orowo (Suing As Administrator And On Behalf Of The Estate Of Mercy Amondi Opiyo); Respondent: Kenya Power and Lighting Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E010 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Directions on Application and Extension of Interim Orders
Outcome
Interim orders extended; application set for oral hearing.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Interim Orders, Appeal Directions
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Interim Orders Appeal Directions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Matunda (Fruit) Bus Services Ltd

Appellant

David Obilu Onyundo

Appellant

Dennis Otieno Oriwo

Respondent

Marren Peter Orowo (Suing As Administrator And On Behalf Of The Estate Of Mercy Amondi Opiyo)

Respondent

Kenya Power and Lighting Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Directions on Application and Extension of Interim Orders

  1. 1 Whether interim orders staying proceedings and delivery of judgment in Bondo PMCC No. 88/2017 should be extended pending hearing of the application.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents were properly served with the mention date and application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents had been duly served with the mention date as previously directed, but had not filed any response to the application. In the interests of justice and to preserve the subject matter of the appeal, the court exercised its discretion to extend the interim orders staying proceedings and delivery of judgment in Bondo PMCC No. 88/2017 until the scheduled hearing date. The court further directed that the application be heard orally on the specified date and that notice be served forthwith on the respondents' counsel and the subordinate court.

Court Disposition

Interim orders extended; application set for oral hearing.

Orders

  • The application dated 13/5/2021 shall be heard orally on 20/7/2021.
  • The applicant to serve the respondent’s counsel forthwith with notice.