[2020] KEHC 3852 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant's plea of guilty was not unequivocal due to his mental incapacity, as evidenced by a medical report that was not brought to the attention of the trial court. The facts did not establish preparation to commit murder, and the appellant's mental health condition rendered him incapable...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 3852 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: MOO; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 10 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Plea of Guilty, Mental Capacity, Preparation to Commit Felony, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MOO
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plea of guilty entered by the appellant was unequivocal given his mental status.
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was excessively harsh considering the appellant was a first offender.
- 3 Whether the appellant was mentally fit to take plea at the time of conviction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant's plea of guilty was not unequivocal due to his mental incapacity, as evidenced by a medical report that was not brought to the attention of the trial court. The facts did not establish preparation to commit murder, and the appellant's mental health condition rendered him incapable of making an informed plea. The court held that the conviction and sentence were unsafe and should be quashed. The appellant should be released to the custody of his mother for appropriate medical treatment, rather than remain incarcerated, to ensure both his welfare and public safety.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The conviction is quashed and the sentence set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT SIAYA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2020
MOO.....................................................................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC......................................................................................RESPONDENT
(Being an Appeal against conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 198 of 2020
in the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Bondo dated 18th May 2020
before Hon. S.W. Mathenge, Resident Magistrate)
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant MOO was convicted on his own plea of guilty for the offence of preparation to commit a felony contrary to Section 308(1) of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to serve seven years imprisonment by Hon. S. Mathenge, Resident Magistrate in Bondo PM Cr. Case No. 198/2020.
2. He has appealed through his advocate Mr. Ochanyo challenging the Plea as taken on account that the Plea was equivocal and secondly that the sentence imposed was excessively harsh in the circumstances as the accused was a first offender.
3. The third ground which is now emerging by way of supplementary affidavit sworn by Theresa Achieng Onyango, the appellant’s mother on 27/7/2020 attaching medical Report from Siaya County Referral Hospital dated 11/8/2019 shows that the appellant suffers from a mental illness hence he may not have been in sound mental state to take a Plea.
4. The Prosecution concedes to these facts and adds that the language of the court which the accused pleaded to was not shown.
5. I have considered the grounds of appeal and submissions by Mr. Okachi Senior Principal Prosecution Counsel for the Respondent State.
6. It is clear that there is a medical report showing the incapacity of the accused person to take plea which was not brought to the attention of the trial court. Nonetheless, I observe that the Plea was not unequivocal and from the facts read out in court, there was no indication that the accused who was found merely hiding in a banana plantation and holding a stone and panga had intended to commit the felony of Murder as alleged in the particulars of the offence, considering his mental status. If the accused threw a stone at the complainant and then escaped leaving behind his sandals, a panga and clothing, that in itself is not proof of preparation to commit the offence of Murder. With the medical report availed, it is clear that the appellant has a mental issue which should be handled by his family members taking responsibility to take him to hospital for treatment and not to leave him to wander around to pose a risk to other members of the society.
7. Accordingly, I allow this appeal, quash the conviction on an equivocal plea as the appellant was incapable of taking such plea and set aside the seven years imprisonment term imposed on the appellant.
8. I order that the appellant be released from prison forthwith and handed over to his mother TAO who has sworn an affidavit and who shall ensure that the appellant is checked into a hospital for appropriate treatment so that he is not a risk and danger to the public.
9. Orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya this 29th Day of July, 2020
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE