[2023] KEELRC 1418 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1418 (KLR)

The court found that the issue of non-supply of documents was not raised in either examination in chief or cross-examination. Therefore, the claimant's counsel could not introduce this issue during re-examination. The objection by the respondent was upheld, and the court directed that re-examination proceed without...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1418 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joyce Mideva Mavisi; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Employment and Labour Relations Cause 1725 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Cause / Ruling on Objection During Re Examination
Outcome
Objection upheld; re-examination to proceed without introducing new issues.
Judges
Nzioki wa Makau
Legal Topics
Re Examination Scope, Objection to Questions, Documentary Evidence, Termination of Employment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Re Examination Scope Objection to Questions Documentary Evidence Termination of Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joyce Mideva Mavisi

Applicant

Kenya Revenue Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Cause / Ruling on Objection During Re Examination

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's counsel introduced new issues during re-examination contrary to procedural rules.
  2. 2 Whether the issue of non-supply of documents was previously raised in examination in chief or cross-examination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issue of non-supply of documents was not raised in either examination in chief or cross-examination. Therefore, the claimant's counsel could not introduce this issue during re-examination. The objection by the respondent was upheld, and the court directed that re-examination proceed without reference to the non-supply of documents, as it was not part of the earlier testimony. The ruling reinforces the procedural rule that re-examination must be confined to clarifying matters raised in cross-examination and cannot be used to introduce new issues.

Court Disposition

Objection upheld; re-examination to proceed without introducing new issues.

Orders

  • Objection to the line of questioning in re-examination is upheld.
  • Re-examination to proceed without reference to non-supply of documents.