[2024] KEELRC 1612 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was occasioned by factors beyond her control, specifically the unavailability of the judgment and proceedings, and that her right of appeal should not be defeated by administrative delays. The court noted that the interests of justice favored granting...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 1612 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Rose Gesare Mayienda; Respondent: Nyangena Hospital Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E054 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Change of Advocate
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Judges
- S Radido
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Change of Advocate, Delay in Filing Appeal, Right of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rose Gesare Mayienda
Applicant
Nyangena Hospital Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Change of Advocate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment in Kisii MC ELRC No. E011 of 2022.
- 2 Whether the firm of Ombui Ratemo & Associates Advocates should be allowed to come on record for the applicant in place of the previous advocates.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was occasioned by factors beyond her control, specifically the unavailability of the judgment and proceedings, and that her right of appeal should not be defeated by administrative delays. The court noted that the interests of justice favored granting the applicant leave to appeal out of time, especially as the applicant had annexed a draft memorandum of appeal and demonstrated intent to pursue the appeal. The court also allowed the change of advocate as there was no objection from the respondent. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought by the applicant.
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- The firm of Ombui Ratemo & Associates Advocates is allowed to come on record for the applicant.
- The applicant is granted leave to file and serve a Memorandum of Appeal within 30 days from the date of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Mayienda v Nyangena Hospital Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application E054 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 1612 (KLR) (26 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 1612 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Civil Application E054 of 2024
S Radido, J
June 26, 2024
Between
Rose Gesare Mayienda
Applicant
and
Nyangena Hospital Ltd
Respondent
Ruling
1. Rose Gesare Mayienda (the applicant) filed a Motion with the Court on 14 May 2024, against Nyangena Hospital Ltd (the Respondent) seeking orders:i.…ii.That the firm of Ombui Ratemo & Associates Advocates be granted leave to come on record as advocates for the applicant herein in place of Messrs Samuel N. Mainga & Co. Advocates.iii.That the Honourable Court be pleased to grant the applicant leave to file appeal out of time against the decree and judgment in Kisii MC ELRC No. E011 of 2022, Rose Gesare Mayienda v Nyangena Hospital Ltd.iv.That costs of this application be in the cause.
2. The grounds in support of the application were that the delay in filing the Appeal was inadvertent and excusable because the applicant had not been able to secure a copy of the judgment and proceedings to prepare a Memorandum of Appeal; the previous advocate on record was not keen to pursue an Appeal; the intended Appeal was meritorious and that it was in the interest of justice to grant the orders sought.
3. The Respondent filed on 27 May 2024 a replying affidavit sworn by its General Manager asserting that the application did not meet the threshold for grant of leave to Appeal out of time; the request for copy of judgment and proceedings was lodged with the registry on 30 November 2023, just a few days before lapse of the 30-days window to Appeal, the judgment having been delivered on 6 November 2023; there was indolence and inordinate delay as it had taken the applicant about 5 months after the request for proceedings to file the instant application; the application offended the mandatory provisions of Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016 and section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
4. The applicant filed her submissions on 31 May 2024 and the Respondent on 11 June 2024.
5. The Court has considered the Motion, affidavits and submissions.
New advocate on record 6. The Respondent has not objected to the plea by the firm of Ombui Ratemo & Associates Advocates to come on record for the applicant, and the Court will as a matter of procedure allow the said firm to come on record.
Grant of leave to Appeal out of time 7. One of the primary grounds advanced by the applicant in support of the prayer for leave to appeal out of time is that copies of proceedings and judgment had not been released by the time of making the application.
8. It has now become a performance standard in this jurisdiction that a Court should release or publicise a judgment or decision to the parties and Kenya Law Reports within 5 days of delivery.
9. This Court does not understand why it has taken this long for the trial Court to release the judgment. The Court says this while alive to the fact that apart from the judgment, expeditious typing of proceedings has been a challenge in various court stations because of human resource constraints.
10. The applicant has a right of appeal against the judgment of the Principal Magistrate.
11. The applicant has annexed a draft Memorandum of Appeal to the Motion. The delay to file the Memorandum of Appeal was occasioned by factors beyond her control (see Njoroge v Kimani (2022) KECA 1188 (KLR)).
12. In the Court’s view, the interests of justice tilt towards exercising the Court’s discretion in favour of the applicant.
Orders 13. In light of the above, the Court orders:i.The firm of Ombui Ratemo & Associates Advocates is allowed to come on record for the applicant.ii.The applicant is granted leave to file and serve a Memorandum of Appeal within 30-days from today.
14. Costs of the application to abide the Appeal.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY, DATED AND SIGNED IN KISUMU ON THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2024. RADIDO STEPHEN, MCIArbJUDGEAppearancesFor applicant Ombui Ratemo & Associates AdvocatesFor Respondent Cecilia Milimu AdvocatesCourt Assistant Chemwolo