[2024] KEHC 11730 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 11730 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed by the Deputy Registrar and a certificate of taxation issued for Kshs. 65,139.80. The respondent did not file any response or challenge to the application or the certificate of taxation. In the absence of any opposition or evidence to the contrary,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 11730 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mbai Waweru Advocates; Respondent: Kenya Alliance Insurance Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E426 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs; respondent to pay costs of application
Judges
JM Nang'ea
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Certificate of Taxation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Certificate of Taxation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mbai Waweru Advocates

Applicant

Kenya Alliance Insurance Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is liable for the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed by the Deputy Registrar and a certificate of taxation issued for Kshs. 65,139.80. The respondent did not file any response or challenge to the application or the certificate of taxation. In the absence of any opposition or evidence to the contrary, the court held that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed sum as certified. The court further ordered that the costs of the application be borne by the respondent, as the application was unopposed and the applicant was successful.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs; respondent to pay costs of application

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent in the sum of Kshs. 65,139.80 as taxed costs.
  • The respondent shall pay the costs of this application.