[2023] KEMC 154 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendants were 100% liable for the accident. This finding was based on the plaintiff's testimony, police abstract, and motor vehicle search confirming the 1st defendant's ownership. The court held that the plaintiff had pleaded...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEMC 154 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mercy Waruino Mbaki; Defendant: Said Chedu & Another
- Court
- Magistrate's Court
- Court Station
- Chief Magistrate's Court (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit E544 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff.
- Judges
- JP Aduke
- Legal Topics
- Road Traffic Accidents, Negligence, Personal Injury, Damages Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mercy Waruino Mbaki
Plaintiff
Said Chedu & Another
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were liable in negligence for the road traffic accident involving the plaintiff.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff proved her claim for special and general damages arising from the accident.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendants were 100% liable for the accident. This finding was based on the plaintiff's testimony, police abstract, and motor vehicle search confirming the 1st defendant's ownership. The court held that the plaintiff had pleaded and proved special damages of KES 10,825 by way of receipts. For general damages, the court considered comparable authorities and the nature of injuries (fracture of the right lower limb and soft tissue injuries), awarding KES 350,000. The absence of the defence at the hearing did not displace the plaintiff's evidence. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff for general and...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Orders
- General damages of KES 350,000 awarded to the plaintiff.
- Special damages of KES 10,825 awarded to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Mbaki v Chedu & Another (Civil Suit E544 of 2020) [2023] KEMC 154 (KLR) (7 June 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 154 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Chief Magistrate's Court (Milimani Law Courts)
Civil Suit E544 of 2020
JP Aduke, SRM
June 7, 2023
Between
Mercy Waruino Mbaki
Plaintiff
and
Said Chedu & Another
Defendant
Judgment
1. The Plaintiff filed this suit against the defendants after she sustained injuries following a road traffic accident on 02nd Sept 2019 along 1st Avenue in Eastleigh in Nairobi. In the plaint available on record, the plaintiff avers she was a lawful pedestrian trying to board motor vehicle registration number KBC 769S when the Defendants either acting as servant/agent/authorized driver of motor vehicle registration number KBC 769S negligently drove the said motor vehicle that it sped off before the Plaintiff boarded causing the Plaintiff to suffer injuries.
2. The Plaintiff blames the Defendants and their agents/authorized servants for causing the said accident. The Plaintiff further avers that the said accident was solely caused by the negligence of the Defendants.
3. The particulars of injuries sustained by the Plaintiff are captured in para 7 of the Plaint while the particulars of alleged negligence are also captured in para 5 of the Plaint. The Plaintiff prays for general damages for pain and suffering, special damages, costs of the suit, and interest at court rates.
4. Return of Service on Record shows that the defendants were served with the suit papers. The suit is defended. At the hearing thereof, the Plaintiff called one witness who testified and adopted their statement on file as their evidence in chief. The Defence was absent on the date of hearing in spite of service from the return of service available on file. The Plaintiff Counsel prayed that the court close the defence case in their absence. The court allowed this oral application and closed the defence case. Parties filed and exchanged submissions. The issues for determination before this court are two:
1. Liability; 5. With respect to Liability, I have seen a copy of the Abstract from Police Records confirming further details in respect of the accident victim and the said motor vehicle registration number KBC 769S. I have seen a copy of the Motor Vehicle Search Records confirming that the 1st defendant was the registered owner of the said motor vehicle as at 22nd January 2020. I have also relied on the testimony of PW1 on record. This confirmation and chronology settles the issue of liability in my view. For the avoidance of doubt, I find that liability is apportioned at a ratio of 100% in favor of the Plaintiff against the defendants.
- 2. Quontum 6. The Plaintiff prays for General Damages, Special Damages, future medical expenses, Costs of the Suit and any other relief. With respect to Special Damages, the Plaint prays for KES 10,825/- as captured in the Plaint. I have seen receipts on record attesting to KES 10,825/-. It is settled principle that special damages must be pleaded and proved. I find that KES 10,825/- has been pleaded and proved and award the same.
7. With respect to general damages, I have considered all the submissions on record and the authorities annexed thereto. I have also considered all the exhibits on record. In particular, I have relied on the reasoning of the court in Civil Appeal Number 126 of 2018 Benuel Bosire v Lydia Kemunto Mokora[2019]eKLR and Patrisiah Adhiammbo Omolo vs Emily Mandala[2020] EKLR where the courts awarded general damages for comparable injuries. From the documents on record, the plaintiff in this instance suffered a fracture of the right lower limb and soft tissue injuries when the accident happened. Taking into account that no amount of damages can restore the Plaintiff to what she was prior to the said accident, the rate of inflation and cost of living, I hereby award KES 350,000/- as general damages for pain and suffering.
8. In conclusion, I enter judgement in favour of the plaintiff as follows:1. General damages KES 350,000/-2. Special damages KES 10,825/-3. Costs of the suit.4. Interest on 1 and 3 above at court rates.
9. The Plaintiff shall have costs in this suit and interests as outlined above from the date of this judgement until payment in full.
ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATEJUDGEMENT SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY IN NAIROBI THIS 07TH JUNE 2023 IN THE ABSENCE/PRESENCE OF THE PARTIES AT 3PM.In the presence of :1. Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe.2. Counsel for the Plaintiff- ………N/A…………….…………………………………………………………..(Name, Signature, Date)3. For the Defence: ……………N/A………………………………….………………………………..(Name, Signature, Date)