[2015] KEELC 409 (KLR)
The court found that the Applicants had established, through uncontested evidence, that they had occupied and developed the suit property continuously, peacefully, exclusively, and in a manner adverse to the Respondent's interests for more than twelve years. The Respondent did not contest the claim, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELC 409 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mbarak Abdalla Abud; Applicant: Mbarak Awadhi Omar; Applicant: Answar Salim Mohamed; Respondent: Saleh Bin Abdalla Shuruti
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 29 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Judgment
- Outcome
- originating summons allowed
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Land Title Registration, Ownership Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mbarak Abdalla Abud
Applicant
Mbarak Awadhi Omar
Applicant
Answar Salim Mohamed
Applicant
Saleh Bin Abdalla Shuruti
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants have acquired title to sub-division number 224/III/MN by adverse possession.
- 2 Whether the Applicants' occupation of the suit property has been continuous, peaceful, exclusive, and adverse for at least twelve years.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Applicants had established, through uncontested evidence, that they had occupied and developed the suit property continuously, peacefully, exclusively, and in a manner adverse to the Respondent's interests for more than twelve years. The Respondent did not contest the claim, and the Applicants' evidence was corroborated by a letter from the Assistant Chief. The court held that the Applicants had dispossessed the Respondent and met the legal requirements for adverse possession under the Limitation of Actions Act. Consequently, the Applicants were entitled to be registered as proprietors of the suit property as tenants in common in equal shares.
Court Disposition
originating summons allowed
Orders
- A declaration is made that the Applicants are entitled to sub-division number 224/III/MN by virtue of adverse possession.
- The Chief Land Registrar is directed to register sub-division number 224/III/MN in favour of the three Applicants as tenants in common with equal shares and issue a Certificate of Title to them.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT MALINDI
HCCC NO. 29 OF 2010 (0S)
1. MBARAK ABDALLA ABUD
2. MBARAK AWADHI OMAR
3. ANSWAR SALIM MOHAMED..........................................APPLICANTS
=VERSUS=
SALEH BIN ABDALLA SHURUTI........................................RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
Introduction:
In the Originating Summons dated 7th April 2010, the three Applicants are seeking to be declared as the proprietors of parcel of land known as sub-division number 224/III/MN CR No.4119 by virtue of the doctrine of adverse possession.
According to the Affidavit of the 2nd Applicant, the 1st and 3rd Applicant are his brothers; that they were raised on the suit property and that they have fully developed the parcel of land.
It is the deposition of the Applicants that the Defendant has never questioned their presence on the suit property and that they do not know his whereabouts.
The Applicants annexed on the Affidavit a letter by the Assistant Chief. According to the Assistant's Chief's letter, the three Applicant's are residing on the suit property and they have cash crops.
The Respondent was served with the Originating Summons by way of advertisement in the Standard Newspaper but neither entered appearance nor filed a Replying Affidavit.
The Originating Summons proceeded by way of viva voce evidence. PW1, PW2 and PW3 all informed the Court that they have been living on the suit property for more than 30 years continuously, peacefully and exclusively.
In the absence of a Replying Affidavit, the Applicant's evidence is not controverted.
Having read the Originating Summons and heard the Applicants, I am satisfied that the Applicants have dispossessed the Respondent the suit property having stayed on the land for more than twelve (12) years continuously, peacefully, exclusively and in a manner that is adverse to the Respondent's interests in the land.
For those reasons, I allow the Originating Summons dated 7th April 2010 in the following terms:
(a) A declaration be and is hereby made that the Applicants are entitled to all that parcel of land occupied by them and described as sub-division number 224/III/MN by virtue of adverse possession.
(b) The Chief Land Registrar, be and is hereby directed to register sub-division number 224/III/MN in favour of the three Applicants as tenants in common with equal shares and issue to the Applicants with a Certificate of Title.
(c) Each party to bear his own costs.
Dated and delivered in Malindi this 26th day of June,2015.
O. A. Angote
Judge