[2025] KEELC 3044 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient efforts to trace the judgment debtor or to serve her with the necessary transfer documents as required under Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act. There was no evidence of attempts to locate, serve, or communicate with the defendant at her last...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 3044 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Michael maling'a Mbito; Defendant: Florence Kathleen Law
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 2 April 2025
- Case Number
- Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 20 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Ruling on Post Judgment Execution Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- CK Nzili
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Execution of Decree, Transfer of Land, Powers of Deputy Registrar
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael maling'a Mbito
Plaintiff
Florence Kathleen Law
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling on Post Judgment Execution Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should authorize the Deputy Registrar to execute subdivision and transfer documents in place of the defendant due to her absence.
- 2 Whether the court should dispense with the production of the original title deed for LR No. 11005 (IR No. 18979) to facilitate execution of the decree.
- 3 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient efforts to trace the judgment debtor and comply with Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient efforts to trace the judgment debtor or to serve her with the necessary transfer documents as required under Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act. There was no evidence of attempts to locate, serve, or communicate with the defendant at her last known address, nor any effort to secure the original title deed. In the absence of such evidence, the court held that the threshold for invoking Section 98 had not been met. Furthermore, the court noted that the decree already contained self-executing vesting orders, and the applicant had not explained why he had not approached the Land Registrar for registration based on those...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 13/9/2024 is dismissed.
- No orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment