[2024] KEELC 523 (KLR)
The court found that the application by the defendant's advocate to cease acting was unopposed and had been pending for a long time. In the interest of expeditious disposal of cases and in line with the principles of justice under Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 3 of the Environment and Land Court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 523 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Paul Otieno Mboga; Defendant: Mikal Oluoch Oguya
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Land Case 29 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case / Ruling on Advocate's Application to Cease Acting
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Advocate granted leave to cease acting for the defendant. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- GMA Ongondo
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Ceasing to Act, Leave of Court, Environment and Land Court Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Otieno Mboga
Plaintiff
Mikal Oluoch Oguya
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Ruling on Advocate's Application to Cease Acting
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the advocate for the defendant should be granted leave to cease acting for the defendant.
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded for the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application by the defendant's advocate to cease acting was unopposed and had been pending for a long time. In the interest of expeditious disposal of cases and in line with the principles of justice under Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act, the court determined that the application was merited. The court therefore allowed the advocate to cease acting for the defendant and made no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Advocate granted leave to cease acting for the defendant. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The advocate on record for the defendant, G.S Okoth and Company Advocates, is granted leave to cease from further acting for the defendant.
- There is no order as to the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Mboga v Oguya (Land Case 29 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 523 (KLR) (8 February 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 523 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Land Case 29 of 2021
GMA Ongondo, J
February 8, 2024
Between
Paul Otieno Mboga
Plaintiff
and
Mikal Oluoch Oguya
Defendant
Ruling
1. By a Notice of motion dated 8th February 2023, the firm of G.S Okoth and Company Advocates for the defendant, is seeking the orders infra;a.The Honourable Court be pleased to grant leave for the Advocate on record for the defendant, M/s G.S Okoth and Company Advocates, to cease from further acting for the defendant herein.b.There be no order as to the costs of this application.
2. There is no response to the application.
3. The application has been pending in court for long. The same cries for determination in the spirit of Article 159 (2) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2015 [2011].
4. In the foregone, I find the application steadfast and merited.
5. Accordingly, the application be and is hereby allowed in terms of orders 1 and 2 as stated in paragraph 1 (a) and (b) hereinabove.
6. It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT HOMA BAY THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024. G. M. A ONG’ONDOJUDGEPRESENT1. Luanga, court assistant