[2021] KECA 200 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 200 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants were not at fault for the delay in filing the appeal, as the notice of dismissal was served upon their advocates after the period for lodging an appeal had already lapsed. The judge verified the applicants' averments from the record and concluded that the circumstances justified...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECA 200 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Mwangi Mbote; Applicant: Abraham Mukuru Mbote; Respondent: Gladys Wanjeri Mbuthia; Respondent: Beth Wambui Mbuthia; Respondent: Mukuru Mbuthia
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 56 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DK Musinga
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Out of Time, Summary Dismissal, Service of Judgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Appeal Out of Time Summary Dismissal Service of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Mwangi Mbote

Applicant

Abraham Mukuru Mbote

Applicant

Gladys Wanjeri Mbuthia

Respondent

Beth Wambui Mbuthia

Respondent

Mukuru Mbuthia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment of the Environment and Land Court.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was excusable given the circumstances of service of the dismissal notice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants were not at fault for the delay in filing the appeal, as the notice of dismissal was served upon their advocates after the period for lodging an appeal had already lapsed. The judge verified the applicants' averments from the record and concluded that the circumstances justified the grant of leave to file the appeal out of time. The application for extension of time was therefore allowed, and directions were given for the filing and service of the notice of appeal and the record of appeal within specified timelines.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicants are granted leave to file and serve the notice of appeal within fourteen (14) days from the date of the ruling.
  • The record of appeal shall be filed and served within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the notice of appeal.