[2025] KECPT 215 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 215 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant had established her membership in the respondent Sacco and had issued a valid notice of withdrawal. The respondent failed to provide evidence to rebut the claimant's entitlement to a refund, relying only on unsubstantiated AGM resolutions and a general denial. The Tribunal held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 215 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Faith Wanjiru Mbote; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 562/E727 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Refund Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw
Legal Topics
Sacco Membership, Refund of Savings, Withdrawal Notice
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Sacco Membership Refund of Savings Withdrawal Notice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Faith Wanjiru Mbote

Applicant

Metropolitan National Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refund Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was a member of the respondent Sacco entitled to a refund of her savings.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is liable to pay the claimed sum to the claimant upon withdrawal.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's AGM resolutions lawfully suspended the refund obligation.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant had established her membership in the respondent Sacco and had issued a valid notice of withdrawal. The respondent failed to provide evidence to rebut the claimant's entitlement to a refund, relying only on unsubstantiated AGM resolutions and a general denial. The Tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a refund of her savings, as the respondent's position amounted to a mere denial without evidentiary support. The Tribunal awarded the claimed sum, plus costs and interest at Tribunal rates.

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the claimant for Kshs. 524,000.
  • Respondent to pay costs of the suit.