[1997] KECA 285 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 285 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that the appellant failed to raise any issue of law as required under Section 72(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. Since a second appeal is only permissible on points of law, and none were identified or argued, the appeal was incompetent and could not succeed. The court therefore dismissed the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 285 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Mbugua Kaharo; Respondent: Kiritu Mbugua
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 73 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal; Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeals Process, Second Appeal, Section 72 Civil Procedure Act
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeals Process Second Appeal Section 72 Civil Procedure Act

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mbugua Kaharo

Appellant

Kiritu Mbugua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal; Judgment

  1. 1 Whether any issue of law was raised in the second appeal as required under Section 72(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the appellant failed to raise any issue of law as required under Section 72(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. Since a second appeal is only permissible on points of law, and none were identified or argued, the appeal was incompetent and could not succeed. The court therefore dismissed the appeal with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.