[1997] KECA 42 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 42 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that the appellant had not raised any issue of law as required for a second appeal under Section 72(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. As a result, the appeal was dismissed. The court emphasized that its jurisdiction on a second appeal is limited to questions of law, and since none were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 42 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Mbugua Kaharo; Respondent: Kiritu Mbugua
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 73 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent
Legal Topics
Second Appeal, Section 72 Civil Procedure Act, Appeal Dismissal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Second Appeal Section 72 Civil Procedure Act Appeal Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mbugua Kaharo

Appellant

Kiritu Mbugua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal

  1. 1 Whether any issue of law was raised in the second appeal as required under Section 72(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the appellant had not raised any issue of law as required for a second appeal under Section 72(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. As a result, the appeal was dismissed. The court emphasized that its jurisdiction on a second appeal is limited to questions of law, and since none were presented, there was no basis to interfere with the decision of the High Court.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.