[2006] KEHC 2672 (KLR)
The court found that since the applicant's costs had been taxed, a certificate of costs issued, and the certificate had not been set aside, there was no legal impediment to entering judgment for the applicant. The absence of opposition from the respondent further supported the grant of the orders sought. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 2672 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mbugua & Mbugua Advocates; Respondent: Madison Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 943 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- judgment entered for applicant
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Costs, Entry of Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mbugua & Mbugua Advocates
Applicant
Madison Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether judgment should be entered in favour of the applicant based on the taxed costs as per the certificate of costs.
- 2 Whether there is any legal impediment to entering judgment where the certificate of costs has not been set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since the applicant's costs had been taxed, a certificate of costs issued, and the certificate had not been set aside, there was no legal impediment to entering judgment for the applicant. The absence of opposition from the respondent further supported the grant of the orders sought. The court therefore entered judgment for the applicant for the amount certified in the certificate of costs and awarded costs of the application.
Court Disposition
judgment entered for applicant
Orders
- Judgment is entered for the Advocate applicant for KES 32,635.
- The Advocate applicant is granted costs of the Notice of Motion dated 13th March 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS)
Misc Appli 943 of 2005
MBUGUA & MBUGUA ADVOCATES………….....................…….………PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
MADISON INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED……...................….….DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
The applicant brought a Notice of Motion dated 13th March 2006 seeking that judgment be entered in its favour as per the taxed costs. The application though served was not opposed.
The applicant’s costs were taxed on 31st January 2006 and a certificate of costs was issued and dated 27th February 2006. That certificate of costs has not to date been set aside.
In view of the aforesaid there is no impediment to judgment being entered as prayed.
The orders of this court are: -
(1)That judgment is hereby entered for the Advocate applicant for kshs 32, 635.
(2) That the advocate applicant is granted costs of the Notice of Motion dated 13th March 2006.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Dated and delivered this 28th April 2006.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE