[2025] KEHC 6436 (KLR)
The court held that the applicant was entitled to judgment in terms of the Certificate of Costs, as there was no evidence that the certificate had been set aside or varied and the respondent did not oppose the application. The court further found that, although there was no evidence of service of a fee note, there...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 6436 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mbugwa, Atudo & Macharia Advocates; Respondent: Kenya Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application E189 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed; judgment entered for applicant with interest
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Costs, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mbugwa, Atudo & Macharia Advocates
Applicant
Kenya Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment in terms of the Certificate of Costs issued after taxation of the advocate-client bill of costs.
- 2 Whether interest at 14% per annum is awardable from the date claimed by the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicant was entitled to judgment in terms of the Certificate of Costs, as there was no evidence that the certificate had been set aside or varied and the respondent did not oppose the application. The court further found that, although there was no evidence of service of a fee note, there was evidence that the Notice of Election and Bill of Costs were served on 8/10/2020. Therefore, interest at 14% per annum would run from 30 days after that date, i.e., from 9/11/2020, until payment in full.
Court Disposition
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant with interest
Orders
- Judgment is entered for the applicant/advocate against the respondent/client for Kshs. 281,050 together with interest at 14% per annum from 9/11/2020 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Mbugwa, Atudo & Macharia Advocates v Kenya Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd (Civil Miscellaneous Application E189 of 2022) [2025] KEHC 6436 (KLR) (23 May 2025) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 6436 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Civil Miscellaneous Application E189 of 2022
A Mabeya, J
May 23, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADVOCATES ACT CAP 16 OF THE LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TAXATION OF ADVOCATE-CLIENT BILL OF COSTS
Between
Mbugwa, Atudo & Macharia Advocates
Applicant
and
Kenya Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd
Respondent
Judgment
1. By a Motion on Notice dated 31/5/2024 the Advocate applied for Judgment for Kshs. 281,050/- against the respondent. The Motion was brought under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, Cap 16 Laws of Kenya.
2. The basis for seeking judgment was that it was in terms of a Certificate of Costs dated 26/6/2023. The Advocate also sought interest at the rate of 14% per annum from 8/10/2020 until payment in full.
3. In the Supporting affidavit sworn by Pinto Nelson Atudo on 31/5/2024, it was contended that the Advocates fees became due on 8/10/2020 when judgment was delivered. That on the same day, the Advocates served the respondent with a Notice of Election under paragraph 22 of the Advocates Remuneration Order together with an Advocate-Client Bill of Costs dated 15/2/2022.
4. The said bill of costs was taxed on 24/5/2023 and a Certificate of Costs for Kshs.281,050/- was issued on 26/6/2024. That it was imperative that judgment be entered in terms thereof to enable the Advocate recover its costs.
5. I have considered the record. I have also considered the oral submissions of Ms. Kosgei. I have seen a copy of the Certificate of Costs dated 26/5/2024. It is for Kshs.281,050/.
6. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act provides: -The certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the Court, be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, and the Court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including, in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.”
7. From the foregoing, it is clear that an Advocate is entitled to judgment on the amount certified after a taxation of an advocate-client bill of costs. That certificate must not have been varied or set aside. Although there was no averment in the supporting affidavit that the Certificate of Costs dated 26/6/2024 had not been varied or set aside, the Court will presume that fact as the respondent did not respond to the application.
8. On the 14% interests, this is awardable from 30 days after service of a fee note by an advocate upon his client. In this case, there was no evidence that such a fee note was served and not paid. However, there is evidence that the Notice of Election under paragraph 22 of the Advocates Remuneration Order and Bill of Costs were served upon the respondent on 8/10/2020. The Court will presume that to be the date when the costs of the Advocate were demanded.
9. In this regard, the time for interest will run 30 days from that date, to wit 9/11/2020.
10. Accordingly, I allow the application. Judgment is entered for the applicant/advocate against the respondent/client for Kshs.281,050/- together with interest at 14% p.a from 9/11/2020 until payment in full.It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2025. A. MABEYA, FCI ArbJUDGE