[2024] KEELC 440 (KLR)
The court held that it had already pronounced itself on the issue of filing and serving of documents, specifically through directions given on 20.6.2023 and 28.9.2023. No sufficient grounds were presented to warrant a variation of those directions. Accordingly, the court declined to consider the defendants' trial...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 440 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Francis Ngugi Mburu; Plaintiff: Nyamweya Iries Abuya; Plaintiff: Julia Mwaniki Waititu; Plaintiff: Dominic Muindi Muya; Plaintiff: Esther Wangui Kamau; Plaintiff: Teresia Wangui Kamau; Plaintiff: Silas Ondicho Manu; Plaintiff: Geoffrey Mwaura Kaigai; Defendant: Zucchini Holdings Limited; Defendant: Minto Travels Limited; Defendant: Nerifa Holdings Limited; Applicant: Equity Bank
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 91 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Trial Bundle and Directions
- Outcome
- Application to consider the trial bundle dated 18.8.2023 declined; previous directions on filing and serving of documents affirmed.
- Judges
- LN Mbugua
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Documents, Case Management Directions, Trial Bundle Filing, Land Dispute Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Ngugi Mburu
Plaintiff
Nyamweya Iries Abuya
Plaintiff
Julia Mwaniki Waititu
Plaintiff
Dominic Muindi Muya
Plaintiff
Esther Wangui Kamau
Plaintiff
Teresia Wangui Kamau
Plaintiff
Silas Ondicho Manu
Plaintiff
Geoffrey Mwaura Kaigai
Plaintiff
Zucchini Holdings Limited
Defendant
Minto Travels Limited
Defendant
Nerifa Holdings Limited
Defendant
Equity Bank
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Trial Bundle and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should consider the documents in the trial bundle dated 18.8.2023 filed by the defendants.
- 2 Whether the previous directions on filing and serving of documents should be varied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that it had already pronounced itself on the issue of filing and serving of documents, specifically through directions given on 20.6.2023 and 28.9.2023. No sufficient grounds were presented to warrant a variation of those directions. Accordingly, the court declined to consider the defendants' trial bundle dated 18.8.2023 and affirmed that the previous directions regarding the management of documents and evidence would continue to apply. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural orders to ensure orderly conduct of proceedings.
Court Disposition
Application to consider the trial bundle dated 18.8.2023 declined; previous directions on filing and serving of documents affirmed.
Orders
- The court declines to consider the defendants' trial bundle dated 18.8.2023.
- The previous directions given by the court on 20.6.2023 and 28.9.2023 regarding filing and serving of documents shall continue to apply.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
Mburu & 7 others v Zucchini Holdings Limited & 2 others; Equity Bank (Intended Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case 91 of 2010) [2024] KEELC 440 (KLR) (1 February 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 440 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Environment & Land Case 91 of 2010
LN Mbugua, J
February 1, 2024
Between
Francis Ngugi Mburu
1st Plaintiff
Nyamweya Iries Abuya
2nd Plaintiff
Julia Mwaniki Waititu
3rd Plaintiff
Dominic Muindi Muya
4th Plaintiff
Esther Wangui Kamau
5th Plaintiff
Teresia Wangui Kamau
6th Plaintiff
Silas Ondicho Manu
7th Plaintiff
Geoffrey Mwaura Kaigai
8th Plaintiff
and
Zucchini Holdings Limited
1st Defendant
Minto Travels Limited
2nd Defendant
Nerifa Holdings Limited
3rd Defendant
and
Equity Bank
Intended Interested Party
Ruling
1. This ruling relates to the averments set forth by Mr. Opole for defendant on 31. 10. 2023 where they indicated that they have a trial bundle dated 18. 8.2023. They want the court to consider the documents in the said Trial Bundle. However the court has already pronounced itself on the issue of filing and serving of documents. To this end, the court was not moved to vary the directions given on 20. 6.2023 and on 28. 9.2023. In that regard, the court will not belabour the issue any more, save to state that the previous directions given by the court on 20. 6.2023 and 28. 9.2023 shall apply.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 1STDAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS.LUCY N. MBUGUAJUDGEIn the presence of:-Omaiyo for Plaintiffs (save 7th)Ondiki 7th Plaintiff in PersonOpole holding brief for Mango for 3rd DefendantCourt Assistant: Eddel