[2024] KEELC 4286 (KLR)
The court held that the applicant's attempt to seek substantive orders for cancellation of a land register via a miscellaneous application was procedurally improper. The cited statutory provisions do not permit the grant of such substantive reliefs through miscellaneous proceedings. The proper procedure for seeking...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 4286 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Murage Mbutu; Respondent: Land Registrar – Nakuru
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 12 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Cancellation of Land Register
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- A Ombwayo
- Legal Topics
- Land Register Cancellation, Register Tampering, Proper Commencement of Suit, Miscellaneous Application Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Murage Mbutu
Applicant
Land Registrar – Nakuru
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Cancellation of Land Register
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant can seek cancellation of the land register by way of a miscellaneous application.
- 2 Whether the cited statutory provisions allow substantive relief through miscellaneous proceedings.
- 3 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient evidence of directorship in the relevant co-operative society.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicant's attempt to seek substantive orders for cancellation of a land register via a miscellaneous application was procedurally improper. The cited statutory provisions do not permit the grant of such substantive reliefs through miscellaneous proceedings. The proper procedure for seeking cancellation of a land register is by instituting a suit in accordance with the Civil Procedure Act and Rules. Additionally, the applicant failed to provide evidence of his directorship in the Wiumiririe Farmers Co-operative Society, further undermining his standing. Consequently, the application was dismissed for want of legal basis and procedural propriety.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 11th March 2024 is dismissed.
- There shall be no orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Mbutu v Land Registrar – Nakuru (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 12 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 4286 (KLR) (23 May 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 4286 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 12 of 2024
A Ombwayo, J
May 23, 2024
Between
Paul Murage Mbutu
Applicant
and
Land Registrar – Nakuru
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant prays for orders that this honorable Court be pleased to order for cancellation of the Kieseges Subukia West Block 2 (Wiumiririe) register currently held by the Lands office which has been tampered with and this honorable Court do order that the Land Registrar do adopt the Original Register held by Wiumiririe Farmers Co-Operative Society as the true copy of the Register. That this Honorable Court be pleased to grant any other relief this court may deem fit and just to grant.Costs be in cause.
2. The application is based on grounds that the Applicant is a Director of Wiumiririe Farmers Co-operative Society Limited since the year 1996 todate. The said Co-operative Society is the holder of Wiumiririe Farm Register drawn in the year 1979 with a total of 778 members.
3. The said Co-operative Society is the owner of Kieseges/Subukia West Block 2 (Wiumiririe). The Register at the Land's Offices has been tampered with and several parcels of land have been interfered with i.e Double registration.
4. The Applicant is the registered owner of Kieseges/Subukia West Block 2/606 (Wiumiririe) which had been irregularly/illegally allocated to one Paul Macharia Mbugua and a Title Deed issued to him.
5. The Applicant filed Nakuru CMCC EL.C No. 172 of2019 - Paul Murage Mbutu & Kibe Gakuna -Vs- Paul Macharia Mbugua & Land Registrar - Nakuru which case was ruled in his favour.
6. Unless this Honorable Court orders for cancellation of Kieseges Subukia West Block 2 (Wiumiririe) Register at the Lands office which has already been tampered with, the Applicant and all the Members of Wiumiririe Farmers Co-Operative Society will suffer irreparable loss and damage. It is in the best interest of justice that this instant Application be allowed. The Respondent will not suffer any prejudice if the applications is allowed. The supporting affidavit reiterates the grounds of the application.
7. The application is brought under section 9 of the land registration Act which provides that :-The Registrar shall maintain the register and any document required to be kept under this Act in a secure, accessible and reliable format including—(a)publications, or any matter written, expressed, or inscribed on any substance by means of letters, figures or marks, or by more than one of those means, that may be used for the purpose of recording that matter;(b)electronic files; and(c)an integrated land resource register.(2)The register shall contain the following particulars—(a)name, personal identification number, national identity card number, and address of the proprietor;(b)in the case of a body corporate, name, postal and physical address, certified copy of certificate of incorporation, personal identification numbers and passport size photographs of persons authorized and where necessary attesting the affixing of the common seal;(c)names and addresses of the previous proprietors;(d)size, location, user and reference number of the parcel;(da)passport number, telephone number and email address, where applicable; and(e)any other particulars as the Registrar may, from time to time, determine.
8. Moreover, the same is said to be brought under section 19 of the Environment and land court Act which provides:-1)In any proceedings to which this Act applies, the Court shall act expeditiously, without undue regard to technicalities of procedure.(2)The Court shall be bound by the procedure laid down by the Civil Procedure Act (Cap. 21).
9. I do find that the cited provision of law do not allow the applicant to come to court by way of a miscellaneous application and therefore the application dated 11th March 2024 has no basis in law. The applicant is seeking substantive prayers and therefore should commence a suit in the manner prescribed by the Civil Procedure Rules 2010, and the Civil Procedure Act Cap 21 Laws of Kenya and not a miscellaneous application. Moreover, there is no evidence that the applicant is the director of Wiumirire Farmers’ Co-operative society. The application is dismissed with no orders as to costs.
RULING DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAKURU THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY 2024. A. O. OMBWAYOJUDGE