https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12922

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12922

The court found that the advocate-client relationship had broken down because the plaintiff had ceased giving instructions and could not be reached, and since the application was unopposed, there was no basis to compel continued representation; leave to cease acting was therefore granted.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 12922 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mediheal Hospital and Fertility Center Limited; 1st Defendant: Bank of India; 2nd Defendant: Eshikoni Auctioneers
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case E009 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Case; Application by Advocate to Cease Acting / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Leave to Cease Acting
Outcome
Application allowed
Judges
["Sifuna Nixon"]
Legal Topics
Leave to Cease Acting, Advocate Client Relationship, Withdrawal of Instructions, Unopposed Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocacy and Professional Practice Leave to Cease Acting Advocate Client Relationship Withdrawal of Instructions Unopposed Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mediheal Hospital and Fertility Center Limited

Plaintiff

Bank of India

1st Defendant

Eshikoni Auctioneers

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case; Application by Advocate to Cease Acting / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Leave to Cease Acting

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant leave to the advocate to cease acting for the plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether the breakdown of instructions and loss of contact justify termination of representation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the advocate-client relationship had broken down because the plaintiff had ceased giving instructions and could not be reached, and since the application was unopposed, there was no basis to compel continued representation; leave to cease acting was therefore granted.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to Aloo Romanus & Company Advocates to cease acting for the plaintiff in this suit.