[2022] KEHC 11867 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 11867 (KLR)

The court found that the defendants failed to prosecute their preliminary objection by not filing submissions as directed. Furthermore, there was no evidence on record to demonstrate the existence of the alleged parallel suit. The court held that it is not its duty to search for such evidence on behalf of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 11867 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Medlinc Africa Limited; Defendant: Wilkins Chagadwa Lovegwa; Defendant: Collins Lanogwa; Defendant: Elizabeth Wanjiru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit E680 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed with costs
Judges
A Mabeya
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Section 6 Civil Procedure Act, Pendency of Suit, Abuse of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Preliminary Objection Section 6 Civil Procedure Act Pendency of Suit Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Medlinc Africa Limited

Plaintiff

Wilkins Chagadwa Lovegwa

Defendant

Collins Lanogwa

Defendant

Elizabeth Wanjiru

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the suit and application offend section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act due to the existence of another suit involving the same parties and subject matter.
  2. 2 Whether the preliminary objection is merited in the absence of evidence of the alleged pending suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendants failed to prosecute their preliminary objection by not filing submissions as directed. Furthermore, there was no evidence on record to demonstrate the existence of the alleged parallel suit. The court held that it is not its duty to search for such evidence on behalf of the parties. Consequently, the preliminary objection was found to be without merit and was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The preliminary objection dated 23/7/2021 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.