[2008] KEHC 1446 (KLR)
The court found that the registration of LR LTK/Entarara/145 in the names of the defendants was a procedural error resulting from the failure of the land authorities to notify the group to incorporate under the Land (Group Representative) Act. The evidence showed that the land was always intended to be held communally by the group, and the registration of the defendants as proprietors was as trustees for the group, not as absolute owners. The court held that the title issued to the defendants was not valid as it was contrary to the intention of the parties, the applicable law, and the requirements of the Land (Group Representative) Act. The court ordered rectification of the register to...
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 1446 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Melton Lenkakurro; Plaintiff: Peter Merin Sesei; Plaintiff: Tungungua Ole Nteete; Plaintiff: Jackson Meliyio Risie; Plaintiff: Samuel Kayior Lolkinyiei; Plaintiff: Leluai Loowkarara; Plaintiff: Teketi Ole Lekisuma; Defendant: Taiko Moriati; Defendant: Seela Ole Moriati; Defendant: Parsanga Lenkinyi; Defendant: Riamet Ole Lenkere
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2008
- Case Number
- Civil Case 317 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Group Ranch Ownership, First Registration, Rectification of Title, Customary Land Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Melton Lenkakurro
Plaintiff
Peter Merin Sesei
Plaintiff
Tungungua Ole Nteete
Plaintiff
Jackson Meliyio Risie
Plaintiff
Samuel Kayior Lolkinyiei
Plaintiff
Leluai Loowkarara
Plaintiff
Teketi Ole Lekisuma
Plaintiff
Taiko Moriati
Defendant
Seela Ole Moriati
Defendant
Parsanga Lenkinyi
Defendant
Riamet Ole Lenkere
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the registration of LR LTK/Entarara/145 in the names of the defendants was valid under the applicable land laws.
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs, as representatives of Entarara Group Ranch, are entitled to rectification of the land register and ownership of the suit property.
- 3 Whether the defendants hold the suit land in trust for the group members under the Land (Group Representative) Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the registration of LR LTK/Entarara/145 in the names of the defendants was a procedural error resulting from the failure of the land authorities to notify the group to incorporate under the Land (Group Representative) Act. The evidence showed that the land was always intended to be held communally by the group, and the registration of the defendants as proprietors was as trustees for the group, not as absolute owners. The court held that the title issued to the defendants was not valid as it was contrary to the intention of the parties, the applicable law, and the requirements of the Land (Group Representative) Act. The court ordered rectification of the register to...
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiffs
Orders
- The title LTK/ENTATARA/145 in the names of the defendants is cancelled.
- The name of land LTK/Entarara/145 is to be substituted with Entarara Group Ranch as incorporated under the Land (Group Representative) Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment