[2020] KECPT 88 (KLR)

[2020] KECPT 88 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided sufficient documentary evidence, including payslips and receipts, proving her membership in the Respondent Sacco and her cumulative deposits of Ksh. 159,200/-. The Claimant also demonstrated that she gave proper notice of withdrawal in accordance with the Sacco's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECPT 88 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Merceline Mulili Muema; Respondent: Kwetu Sacco Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 406 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimant.
Legal Topics
Sacco Membership Dispute, Refund of Deposits, Notice of Withdrawal, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Sacco Membership Dispute Refund of Deposits Notice of Withdrawal Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Merceline Mulili Muema

Claimant

Kwetu Sacco Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent is indebted to the Claimant for Ksh. 159,200/- and should be ordered to refund the same.
  2. 2 Who should bear the cost of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided sufficient documentary evidence, including payslips and receipts, proving her membership in the Respondent Sacco and her cumulative deposits of Ksh. 159,200/-. The Claimant also demonstrated that she gave proper notice of withdrawal in accordance with the Sacco's by-laws. The Respondent's defence was unsubstantiated and failed to rebut the Claimant's evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the Claimant was entitled to a refund of her deposits, with interest and costs, as the Respondent failed to process the refund after the notice period expired.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimant.

Orders

  • The Respondent shall refund the Claimant Ksh. 159,200/-.
  • The Respondent shall pay interest at court rates.