[2015] KEHC 5513 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 5513 (KLR)

The court found that the conviction for possession of Kangara was unlawful because Kangara is not classified as an alcoholic drink under Section 2 of the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act, and there is no offence for possession of a substance used for distilling chang'aa under the Act. Consequently, the conviction and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 5513 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mercy Chepkwony; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 5 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
Conviction and sentence on count 1 quashed; conviction on count 2 upheld but sentence reduced to time served; applicant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Judges
HI Ong'udi
Legal Topics
Alcoholic Drinks Control, Sentencing Principles, Possession of Illicit Liquor
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Alcoholic Drinks Control Sentencing Principles Possession of Illicit Liquor

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mercy Chepkwony

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for being in possession of Kangara was proper under the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act.
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed for possession of chang'aa was excessive for a first offender.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the conviction for possession of Kangara was unlawful because Kangara is not classified as an alcoholic drink under Section 2 of the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act, and there is no offence for possession of a substance used for distilling chang'aa under the Act. Consequently, the conviction and sentence on count 1 were quashed. For count 2, the court held that although the conviction for possession of chang'aa was proper, the sentence of six months' imprisonment without the option of a fine was too harsh for a first offender who had already served over two months. The sentence was set aside and substituted with a sentence equivalent to the period already served, and the...

Court Disposition

Conviction and sentence on count 1 quashed; conviction on count 2 upheld but sentence reduced to time served; applicant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence on count 1 (possession of Kangara) quashed and set aside.
  • Conviction on count 2 (possession of chang'aa) upheld.