[2013] KEHC 1853 (KLR)
The court found that the record demonstrated the proceedings were conducted in languages understood by the appellant, satisfying the requirement for a fair plea. However, the sentence imposed was deemed excessive given the appellant's status as a first offender. The court exercised its discretion to set aside the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 1853 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mercy Karimi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 42 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_partially_allowed
- Legal Topics
- Plea of Guilty, Sentencing Principles, Language of Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mercy Karimi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plea was taken in a language understood by the appellant.
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive for a first offender.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the record demonstrated the proceedings were conducted in languages understood by the appellant, satisfying the requirement for a fair plea. However, the sentence imposed was deemed excessive given the appellant's status as a first offender. The court exercised its discretion to set aside the sentence of a fine of Ksh 80,000 or one year imprisonment in default and substituted it with a sentence of probation for one year, considering the circumstances and the principle of proportionality in sentencing.
Court Disposition
appeal_partially_allowed
Orders
- The sentence of a fine of Ksh 80,000 or one year imprisonment in default is set aside.
- The appellant is sentenced to probation for one year.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
CRIMINAL APPEAL NUMBER 42 OF 2013
MERCY KARIMI......................................................……...…………..APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC………………………………............……………………..RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the original conviction and sentence in Embu Criminal Case Number 612 of 2013 by M.W. Wachira C M on 1st July, 2013)
JUDGMENT
The appellant was convicted on her own plea of guilty for selling traditional liquor without a licence contrary to Section 7(1) (b) as read with Section 62 of the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act. She appeals against the conviction and sentence.
She argues that the plea was not taken in a language she understands and the sentence of a fine of Ksh 80,000/= in default one year imprisonment was harsh and excessive. The state opposes the appeal and contends that the proceedings were regular and the sentence within the law.
I am satisfied that the record shows that the proceedings were conducted in English/Kiswahili and Kiembu and that she understood the nature of the charges.
I however consider the sentence excessive as she was a first offender.
In the circumstances, I allow the appeal only to the extent that the sentence is set aside and substituted with one of probation for one year. She shall be released forthwith unless lawfully held.
Court:
Judgment read and delivered in open court this 18th day of October, 2013
D.A.S MAJANJA
JUDGE
18. 10. 2013
In the presence of
Mr Njogu for state
Appellant
Njue – Court clerk.