[2022] KEELC 2767 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate a sufficient legal interest warranting joinder as an interested party. The applicant did not provide evidence of the sale agreement, payment, or occupation of the suit land, nor did she explain her delay in seeking joinder since the suit's inception in 2017....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 2767 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Michael Koikai Mereu (Suing on behalf of the Estate of Cecilia Nalagit Mereu); Defendant: Joyce Mukuhi Njenga; Applicant: Margaret Wanjiru Kariuki
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 606 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Joinder as Interested Party
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- MN Gicheru
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Interested Party Application, Sale of Land Disputes, Privity of Contract
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Koikai Mereu (Suing on behalf of the Estate of Cecilia Nalagit Mereu)
Plaintiff
Joyce Mukuhi Njenga
Defendant
Margaret Wanjiru Kariuki
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Joinder as Interested Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established sufficient grounds to be joined as an interested party in the suit.
- 2 Whether the applicant's interests can be protected in this suit or through a separate action.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate a sufficient legal interest warranting joinder as an interested party. The applicant did not provide evidence of the sale agreement, payment, or occupation of the suit land, nor did she explain her delay in seeking joinder since the suit's inception in 2017. The court held that the applicant's interests could be pursued in a separate suit and that her joinder would only serve to delay the current proceedings. Accordingly, the application for joinder was dismissed, and the applicant was directed to file her own suit if she wished to pursue her claims.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 1st February, 2022 is dismissed.
- The applicant is directed to file her own suit if she wishes to pursue her claims.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Mereu (Suing on behalf of the Estate of Cecilia Nalagit Mereu) v Njenga; Kariuki (Intended Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case 606 of 2017) [2022] KEELC 2767 (KLR) (30 June 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 2767 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Environment & Land Case 606 of 2017
MN Gicheru, J
June 30, 2022
Between
Michael Koikai Mereu (Suing on behalf of the Estate of Cecilia Nalagit Mereu)
Plaintiff
and
Joyce Mukuhi Njenga
Defendant
and
Margaret Wanjiru Kariuki
Intended Interested Party
Ruling
1. This ruling is on the Notice of Motion dated 1/2/2022. The said Motion which is under Sections 1A, 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 40 Rules 1 and 4, Order 51 Rules 1 and 3 Civil Procedure Rules and all other enabling provisions of Law seeks to have the applicant Margaret Wanjiru Kariuki join this suit as an interested party.The grounds for seeking to join the suit are that the Applicant has a purchaser’s interest in the suit land because she signed a sale agreement with the Defendant for the purchase of the suit land.She has also learnt that the Plaintiff has cautioned the land and no transaction can take place until this suit is concluded. She concludes by saying that she stands to suffer irreparable loss that cannot be adequately compensated by an award of damages.In addition to the grounds, the Applicant has sworn a supporting affidavit in which she says that paid Kshs. 2 Million to the Defendant and all that remained was Kshs. 1 Million for the transaction to be complete.
2. The application is opposed by the Plaintiff who has sworn a replying affidavit in which he says that the Applicant is a stranger to him and since she has no privity of contract with him, she should file her own suit against the Defendant because he too is aggrieved by the Defendant.
3. Counsel for the parties filed written submissions on 27th and 31st May, 2022. The only issue for determination is whether the Applicant has made out a good case for joining the suit.
4. I have carefully considered the application in its entirety including the affidavits and the submissions. I have also considered the provisions of Order 1 Rule 1 Civil Procedure Rules as to joinder of Plaintiffs.I find that what the Applicant seeks is to join the suit on the side of the Plaintiff so that both may pursue their claims simultaneously.I find that the joinder of the Applicant will delay this suit which has been pending since the year 2017. The Applicant has not proved that this is the only forum through which she can seek redress.She can file her own suit independently of the Plaintiffs and still get what she wants if she is able to prove her case to the required standard.I have not seen the irreparable loss that the Applicant will suffer. I have not seen her agreement with the Defendant. I have not seen evidence of any money paid to the Defendant. I have not seen any evidence of occupation of the suit land.The Applicant has not explained where she has been since the plaintiff filed this suit.For the above reasons, I direct that the Applicant files her own suit. I do so under Order 1 Rule 2 Civil Procedure Rules.Consequently, I dismiss the application dated 1st February, 2022. No order as to costs.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT KAJIADO THIS 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022. M.N. GICHERUJUDGE