[2017] KEELC 1492 (KLR)
The court determined that, given the emotive nature of land disputes and the serious allegations of fraudulent issuance of title deeds, the matter must be heard on its merits rather than relying solely on conflicting reports from the National Land Commission and District Survey Office. The reports were not formally...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 1492 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Merin Ole Tuyoto & 124 Others; Defendant: The Chairman Limanet Group Ranch Committee; Defendant: District Land Registrar; Defendant: The Hon. Attorney General; Defendant: Danson Rikana Sanoe
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Narok
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 246 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Pre Trial Directions Ruling
- Outcome
- Suit to be heard on merit; matter to proceed to full hearing on a priority, day-to-day basis.
- Judges
- MN Kullow
- Legal Topics
- Group Ranch Membership, Fraudulent Title Issuance, Land Title Cancellation, Land Dispute Resolution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Merin Ole Tuyoto & 124 Others
Plaintiff
The Chairman Limanet Group Ranch Committee
Defendant
District Land Registrar
Defendant
The Hon. Attorney General
Defendant
Danson Rikana Sanoe
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Pre Trial Directions Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the issuance of title deeds to non-members of Limanet Group Ranch was fraudulent.
- 2 Whether the court should rely on conflicting reports from the National Land Commission and District Survey Office.
- 3 Whether the suit should proceed to full hearing on merit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that, given the emotive nature of land disputes and the serious allegations of fraudulent issuance of title deeds, the matter must be heard on its merits rather than relying solely on conflicting reports from the National Land Commission and District Survey Office. The reports were not formally requested by the court nor adopted as evidence, and thus cannot conclusively resolve the issues in contention. The court directed that the parties are at liberty to use the reports and call witnesses regarding them during the hearing. Due to the protracted nature of the dispute, the court ordered that the matter be given priority and heard on a day-to-day basis to expedite...
Court Disposition
Suit to be heard on merit; matter to proceed to full hearing on a priority, day-to-day basis.
Orders
- The suit shall be heard on merit.
- Parties are at liberty to use the reports and call witnesses regarding them.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAROK
ELC CAUSE NO. 246 OF 2017
FORMERLY NAKURU ELC NO. 219 OF 2011
MERIN OLE TUYOTO & 124 OTHERS.........................PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
THE CHAIRMAN LIMANET
GROUP RANCH COMMITTEE..........................1ST DEFENDANT
DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR.........................2ND DEFENDANT
THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL...................3RD DEFENDANT
DANSON RIKANA SANOE..............................4TH DEFENDANT
RULING
The Plaintiff in this suit are 125 members who plead that they are the registered members of Limanet Group Ranch and all are the benefit owners of the Land Parcel CIS MARA/ILMASHARIANI/MORIJO/48.
They contend that in the year 2008 the Committee of the Group Ranch in collusion with the 2nd Defendant, the District Land Registrar Narok, fraudulently issued title deeds to strangers who are not members of the Ranch.
In the suit the plaintiff have prayed for orders that all title deeds issued in respect of CIS MARA/ILMASHARIANI/MORIJO/48 be cancelled. A defence was filed by the 1st Defendant denying the claims of the plaintiff. The Attorney General appearing for 2nd and 4th Defendants despite filing a memorandum of appearance has not filed a defence.
Since the filing of the suit herein the same has not taken off to be heard as several applications were filed by each of the parties.
When the matter came before court for directions on how to proceed each of the parties produced before court reports prepared by the National Land Commission and another by the District Survey Office Narok which are both conflicting and contradicting.
I have perused the record and I did not find any order by this court and/or any by any other court in which the aforesaid reports were requested to have the matter concluded.
A glance at the report from the NLC which is dated 20/1/17 and is from the Director of Surveys to one (DR) Lenashuru who from his title seems to be a commissioner of the National Land Commission. The 2nd report though containing various recommendations to my understanding was a document for internal use by the survey Department and the National Land commission.
The 2nd Report is a report by the District Surveyor Narok North/South and addressed to the Chairman of the national Land Commission which the court just like the other has not requested to be done in respect of the suit.
In view of the above and taking into account that the suit herein relates to Land which is very emotive and also the cancellation of titles I direct that the suit be heard on merit since relaying on the said report may not conclusively address the matters in contention.
Parties shall be at liberty to use the said report and call witnesses in respect thereof.
Lastly because this is a matter that has been in court since 2008 almost 10 years, I will order that the same will be heard on priority basis and be heard on day to day basis.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED in open court atNAROKon this2NDday ofOCTOBER, 2017
Mohammed Noor Kullow
Judge
In the presence of:-
Mr Kamwaro for the Chairman of Group Ranch
Mr Morintat for the petitioners
CA:Chuma
Mohamed Noor Kullow
Judge
2/10/17