[2014] KEELRC 560 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant had established his claims on a balance of probabilities, as the respondent failed to defend the suit despite proper service. The evidence showed the claimant worked continuous night shifts without rest days, was denied annual leave, was not paid overtime, and was not paid severance...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEELRC 560 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Meshack Baraza Ipara; Respondent: Inter Security Services Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 183 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Claim / Ex Parte Judgment After Respondent Default
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Overtime Pay, Leave Entitlements, Severance Pay, Unpaid Wages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Meshack Baraza Ipara
Claimant
Inter Security Services Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Ex Parte Judgment After Respondent Default
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for overtime worked without compensation.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment in lieu of untaken annual leave.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for weekly rest days not taken.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant had established his claims on a balance of probabilities, as the respondent failed to defend the suit despite proper service. The evidence showed the claimant worked continuous night shifts without rest days, was denied annual leave, was not paid overtime, and was not paid severance for his years of service. The court applied the relevant provisions of the Employment Act, 2007, and awarded the claimant the sums claimed for overtime, leave, weekly offs, and severance pay. The total award was Kshs. 870,080, with interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full, plus costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant.
Orders
- Respondent to pay the claimant Kshs. 870,080 with interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full.
- Respondent to pay the costs of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
40 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 183 OF 2013
MESHACK BARAZA IPARA .................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
INTER SECURITY SERVICES LIMITED .........................RESPONDENT
M/S S. M. Kitonga for Claimant
JUDGMENT
1. This claim which is undefended was brought by a memorandum of claim dated 31st January 2013 on 8th February 2013.
The Claimant prays for payment:
of overtime in the sum of Kshs. 675, 155;
in lieu of leave in the sum of Kshs. 44,100;
for unpaid 389 weekly offs in the sum of Kshs. 116,700 ;
service charge of Kshs. 31,500;
interest on the award and costs of the suit.
2. Facts of the claim:
The claimant was employed by the Respondent as a security guard on 20th January 2005 and worked continuously until the 31st July, 2012.
He earned monthly salary of Kshs. 9,000 per month paid via account number 0240190665532 held at Equity Bank.
3. That the Claimant was not issued with an appointment letter but he worked on night shifts from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. every day without any day off. He has annexed to the claim a certificate of service dated 7/9/2012 confirming the period he served the Respondent and a letter of resignation dated 22/9/2012.
The resignation was actuated by three night robberies at his station of work in which he barely escaped with his life.
4. The Claimant was entitled to 21 days leave per year but was not allowed to take leave for seven years. He was not paid in lieu of 1 off day per week which he was not allowed to take and was not paid severance pay for every completed year of service at the rate of 15 days salary per year.
5. That inspite of working in excess of 8 hours a night he was not paid overtime. He has attached as Appendix 3 the overtime schedule running from page 9 to page 72.
6. The claims are not controverted due to the default by the Respondent inspite of service of the memorandum of claim by Mr. Isaac O. Oichoe, a duly authorized Court Process Server on 15 February 2013 at the Respondent’s office along Masaba road off Bunyala road and next to NIC Bank at about 1 p.m.
The documents were received by one Elizabeth Wanjiru on behalf of the Respondent who acknowledged receipt by affixing her signature on the reverse of the Principal copy. She also stamped and signed the bottom of the notice of summons returned and duly served.
7. Affidavit of serve dated 18/2/2013 was filed on 4th June 2013.
8. A hearing notice dated 16th April 2013, setting the matter for hearing on 4th November 2013 was duly served on the Respondent on 29th October 2013 and an Affidavit of service was filed by one Justus Nunda Mose a Court clerk with Kitonga & Co. Advocates.
9. The Respondent did not enter appearance, file a response, nor attend the hearing of the matter.
10. The matter proceeded exparte on 4th November 2013 and the Court is satisfied that the Claimant has established the claims made against the Respondent on a balance of probabilities.
11. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favour of the Claimant as follows:
Kshs. 175,155/= being payment of unpaid overtime;
Kshs. 44,100/= being payment in lieu of untaken leave;
Kshs. 116,700/=being payment in lieu of weekly leave days not taken;
Kshs. 31,500/= being severance pay 15 days salary for each completed year of service.
Total award is Kshs. 870,080/=.
12. The Respondent is to pay the total sum of Kshs. 870,080/= with interest at Court rates from the date of this judgment till payment in full.
The claimant is also awarded the costs of the suit.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 26th day March, 2014.
MATHEWS N. NDUMA
PRINCIPAL JUDGE