[2011] KEHC 1734 (KLR)

[2011] KEHC 1734 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had failed to take any steps to prosecute the suit since its filing in 2007, including failing to issue summons. The court held that a plaint without issuance of summons is not alive and that the suit was effectively dead. The absence of any action by the plaintiff and the failure...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] KEHC 1734 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Meshack Okoth Obura practicing as Meshack Okoth Obura & Co. Advocates; Defendant: Industrial & Commercial Development Corporation
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 685 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the defendant
Judges
KH Rawal
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Failure to Prosecute, Issuance of Summons
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Failure to Prosecute Issuance of Summons

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Meshack Okoth Obura practicing as Meshack Okoth Obura & Co. Advocates

Plaintiff

Industrial & Commercial Development Corporation

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inaction by the plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether failure to issue summons renders the suit dead.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had failed to take any steps to prosecute the suit since its filing in 2007, including failing to issue summons. The court held that a plaint without issuance of summons is not alive and that the suit was effectively dead. The absence of any action by the plaintiff and the failure to attend the hearing of the application for dismissal further justified the dismissal. The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution, finding no possibility of revival of the suit.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the defendant

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • The plaintiff shall pay the costs of the suit to the defendant.