[2019] KEELC 4032 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 4032 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff's claim was not for pecuniary damages or for the detention of goods, as required by Order 10 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Therefore, the request for interlocutory judgment did not meet the threshold set by the rule, and the application was dismissed. The court directed the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 4032 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Methodist Church in Kenya Trustees Registered (for MCK Karwamba Church); Respondent: Hand of God Ministries (K) Church
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 07 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Judgment Request
Outcome
request for interlocutory judgment dismissed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Judgment, Order 10 Rule 6, Default Judgment, Church Property Dispute
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Interlocutory Judgment Order 10 Rule 6 Default Judgment Church Property Dispute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Methodist Church in Kenya Trustees Registered (for MCK Karwamba Church)

Applicant

Hand of God Ministries (K) Church

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Judgment Request

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interlocutory judgment under Order 10 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the claim qualifies as one for pecuniary damages or detention of goods.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's claim was not for pecuniary damages or for the detention of goods, as required by Order 10 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Therefore, the request for interlocutory judgment did not meet the threshold set by the rule, and the application was dismissed. The court directed the plaintiff to return for further directions, as the matter could not be disposed of through interlocutory judgment in the circumstances presented.

Court Disposition

request for interlocutory judgment dismissed

Orders

  • The request for interlocutory judgment is dismissed.
  • The plaintiff to return to court on 24.4.2019 for directions.