[2019] KEELRC 1808 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1808 (KLR)

The court found that the determination of when the cause of action arose required resolution of disputed facts, specifically whether the claimant was served with the termination letter in 2013 or only became aware of his dismissal in 2017. The court held that, based on the pleadings, the suit was filed within three...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1808 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Methusellah Oyaro Sereti; Respondent: Kenya Seed Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 29 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Suit as Time Barred
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Termination of Employment, Preliminary Objection, Service of Termination Letter
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation of Actions Termination of Employment Preliminary Objection Service of Termination Letter

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Methusellah Oyaro Sereti

Claimant

Kenya Seed Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Suit as Time Barred

  1. 1 Whether the suit is time-barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the cause of action arose on 28th January 2013 or 3rd February 2017.
  3. 3 Whether the application raises a pure point of law suitable for preliminary objection.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the determination of when the cause of action arose required resolution of disputed facts, specifically whether the claimant was served with the termination letter in 2013 or only became aware of his dismissal in 2017. The court held that, based on the pleadings, the suit was filed within three years from the date the claimant discovered the dismissal (3rd February 2017). Therefore, the application to strike out the suit as time-barred lacked merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 3rd May 2018 is dismissed with costs in the cause.