[2019] KEELC 2727 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants were duly served and that their advocates entered a notice of appointment, contradicting claims of lack of representation. The applicants failed to follow up on their case for three years and delayed seven months after judgment before seeking to set it aside, without adequate explanation for the delay. The applicants did not challenge the plaintiff's title for over three decades and failed to pursue a counterclaim or defence diligently. The court concluded that the applicants had not satisfied the criteria for setting aside a regular ex parte judgment, as their conduct showed indifference and lack of diligence, and no sufficient cause was shown to...
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 2727 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Michael James Karanja; Defendant: Boro Kabuthia; Defendant: Margaret Wambui; Defendant: Joseph Matheri Chege; Defendant: Geoffrey Gatonye Karanja; Defendant: Geoffrey Njaga Githua; Defendant: Kinyanjui Kamondia; Defendant: Moses Karanja; Defendant: Mburu Githua; Defendant: Mburu Nguruko; Defendant: Njenga Kaibuti; Defendant: Njenga Kariuki
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2019
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 323 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- BM Eboso
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Title Registration, Eviction Orders, Adverse Possession Claims
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael James Karanja
Plaintiff
Boro Kabuthia
Defendant
Margaret Wambui
Defendant
Joseph Matheri Chege
Defendant
Geoffrey Gatonye Karanja
Defendant
Geoffrey Njaga Githua
Defendant
Kinyanjui Kamondia
Defendant
Moses Karanja
Defendant
Mburu Githua
Defendant
Mburu Nguruko
Defendant
Njenga Kaibuti
Defendant
Njenga Kariuki
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the criteria for setting aside a regular ex parte judgment.
- 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated a triable defence to warrant reopening the suit.
- 3 Whether the delay in bringing the application to set aside judgment is excusable.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were duly served and that their advocates entered a notice of appointment, contradicting claims of lack of representation. The applicants failed to follow up on their case for three years and delayed seven months after judgment before seeking to set it aside, without adequate explanation for the delay. The applicants did not challenge the plaintiff's title for over three decades and failed to pursue a counterclaim or defence diligently. The court concluded that the applicants had not satisfied the criteria for setting aside a regular ex parte judgment, as their conduct showed indifference and lack of diligence, and no sufficient cause was shown to...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The notice of motion dated 19/4/2018 is rejected.
- Costs to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment