[2018] KEELC 2403 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 2403 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had not provided any evidence of stay orders from the Court of Appeal to support their application for stay of proceedings. The court further noted that Mutungi J had previously declined to issue orders of consolidation and stay, and there was no new material to warrant a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 2403 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Michael Kishon Ole Risa & 8 Others; Defendant: Hon. Gideon Konchellah & 15 Others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 335 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
MN Kullow
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Consolidation of Suits, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Proceedings Consolidation of Suits Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Kishon Ole Risa & 8 Others

Plaintiff

Hon. Gideon Konchellah & 15 Others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant a stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of Kisumu Civil Appeal No. 106 of 2017.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated the existence of stay orders from the Court of Appeal to warrant a stay of proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether the previous orders declining consolidation and stay should be upheld.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had not provided any evidence of stay orders from the Court of Appeal to support their application for stay of proceedings. The court further noted that Mutungi J had previously declined to issue orders of consolidation and stay, and there was no new material to warrant a departure from that decision. Accordingly, the court upheld the previous orders and directed that the matter should proceed. The court stated that should the applicants succeed in obtaining stay orders from the Court of Appeal in the future, the proceedings could be stayed at that time upon service of such orders.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 15th November, 2017 is dismissed.
  • The matter shall proceed as previously ordered.