[2017] KEHC 7257 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 7257 (KLR)

The court held that the grant of bond pending appeal is not automatic and must be determined based on several factors, including the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of the appeal succeeding, the risk of the appellant absconding, the possibility of re-offending, and whether the appellant is likely to serve...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 7257 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Michael Kuhora Njeri; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 182 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Bond Pending Appeal
Outcome
application for bond pending appeal dismissed
Judges
JV Juma
Legal Topics
Bail Pending Appeal, Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Flight Risk, Appeal Success Probability
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail Pending Appeal Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm Sentencing Flight Risk Appeal Success Probability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Kuhora Njeri

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Bond Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be granted bond pending the hearing and determination of his appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant is a flight risk or likely to re-offend if released on bond.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal is likely to succeed or the appellant will serve a substantial part of his sentence before the appeal is heard.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the grant of bond pending appeal is not automatic and must be determined based on several factors, including the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of the appeal succeeding, the risk of the appellant absconding, the possibility of re-offending, and whether the appellant is likely to serve a substantial part of the sentence before the appeal is heard. Upon reviewing the trial record and the submissions of both parties, the court found no merit in the application for bond. The court was not persuaded that the appeal had high chances of success or that the appellant would serve a substantial part of his sentence before the appeal was determined. The court also...

Court Disposition

application for bond pending appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The application for bond pending appeal is declined.
  • The appellant shall continue to serve the sentence until the appeal is heard and determined.