[2013] KEHC 954 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 954 (KLR)

The court held that, according to Section 57 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act, the computation of the 30-day period for execution excludes the day the order was made. Therefore, the execution carried out on 7th September 2013 was within the time allowed by the court's order dated 8th August 2013. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 954 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Michael Kungu Kigia; Respondent: Meru Teachers House Ltd; Respondent: Japhet R. Nkonge t/a Japhet R. Nkonge Auctioneers; Respondent: Kiriinya c/o Nkonge Auctioneers; Respondent: Gitonga c/o Nkonge Auctioneers
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 246 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Execution Timing and Directions for Hearing
Outcome
Execution was in conformity with the court's order; directions issued for hearing and appeal admission.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Execution of Orders, Computation of Time, Appeal Admission
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Execution of Orders Computation of Time Appeal Admission

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Kungu Kigia

Applicant

Meru Teachers House Ltd

Respondent

Japhet R. Nkonge t/a Japhet R. Nkonge Auctioneers

Respondent

Kiriinya c/o Nkonge Auctioneers

Respondent

Gitonga c/o Nkonge Auctioneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Execution Timing and Directions for Hearing

  1. 1 Whether execution of the court's order dated 8th August 2013 was conducted within the prescribed 30-day period.
  2. 2 What directions should be given regarding the hearing of the appellant's application and the admission of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, according to Section 57 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act, the computation of the 30-day period for execution excludes the day the order was made. Therefore, the execution carried out on 7th September 2013 was within the time allowed by the court's order dated 8th August 2013. The court found no irregularity in the timing of the execution and issued directions for the hearing of the appellant's application and the pursuit of the appeal's admission without further delay.

Court Disposition

Execution was in conformity with the court's order; directions issued for hearing and appeal admission.

Orders

  • The application by the appellant dated 9.9.2013 to be heard on 23.10.2013.
  • If the Judge is absent, the application to be heard by the Deputy Registrar.