[2017] KEELC 1805 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1805 (KLR)

The court found that the suit land was registered in the name of the Plaintiffs' deceased father and that there was no evidence of a formal or informal charge registered against the property in favour of the 2nd Defendant. The court held that the 1st and 2nd Defendants could not lawfully sell or dispose of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 1805 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Michael Makumbi; Plaintiff: Joseph Mutuko Kimeu; Plaintiff: Simion Ndeti Kimeu; Plaintiff: Onesmus Musau; Plaintiff: Titus Masila Kimeu; Plaintiff: Lawrence Mbithi; Plaintiff: Christofer Mutinda; Defendant: Sadique Enterprises; Defendant: Hyline Kwamboka; Defendant: Issac Kimeu Mutuku
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 204 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Succession of Land, Injunctive Relief, Title Deeds, Intermeddling With Estate
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Succession of Land Injunctive Relief Title Deeds Intermeddling With Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Makumbi

Plaintiff

Joseph Mutuko Kimeu

Plaintiff

Simion Ndeti Kimeu

Plaintiff

Onesmus Musau

Plaintiff

Titus Masila Kimeu

Plaintiff

Lawrence Mbithi

Plaintiff

Christofer Mutinda

Plaintiff

Sadique Enterprises

Defendant

Hyline Kwamboka

Defendant

Issac Kimeu Mutuku

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the 1st and 2nd Defendants can lawfully sell or dispose of the suit land registered in the name of a deceased person.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to an injunction restraining the Defendants from evicting them or disposing of the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the Defendants are entitled to hold or use the original title deed as security for a debt allegedly owed by the 3rd Defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the suit land was registered in the name of the Plaintiffs' deceased father and that there was no evidence of a formal or informal charge registered against the property in favour of the 2nd Defendant. The court held that the 1st and 2nd Defendants could not lawfully sell or dispose of the property, as the registered owner was deceased and the estate had not been administered in accordance with the Law of Succession Act. The Defendants' only recourse was to pursue the 3rd Defendant personally for the alleged debt. The court concluded that the Plaintiffs had established a prima facie case and were entitled to the injunctive relief sought, restraining the Defendants...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The 1st and 2nd Defendants are restrained from evicting the persons living on parcel Mbooni/Ilani/40 and their families pending determination of the suit.
  • The 1st and 2nd Defendants are compelled to hand over the original title deed of land parcel Mbooni/Ilani/40 to the Plaintiffs.