[2020] KEHC 3134 (KLR)
The court found that since there was no stay of execution in place, there was no valid reason to prevent the respondent from executing the decree. The main appeal remained unheard, but the absence of a stay meant the respondent was entitled to the fruits of his judgment. Retaining the lower court file in the High...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 3134 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael Mwangi Guchura; Respondent: Martin Wambua Kitavi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 18 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Temporary Release of Lower Court File for Execution
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- K Kimondo
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Release of Court File, Execution of Decree
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Mwangi Guchura
Appellant
Martin Wambua Kitavi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Temporary Release of Lower Court File for Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lower court file should be temporarily released to enable execution of the decree.
- 2 Whether the absence of a stay of execution justifies allowing the respondent to execute the decree.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since there was no stay of execution in place, there was no valid reason to prevent the respondent from executing the decree. The main appeal remained unheard, but the absence of a stay meant the respondent was entitled to the fruits of his judgment. Retaining the lower court file in the High Court would unjustifiably delay execution and allow the appellant to enjoy a fictitious reprieve. Therefore, the Deputy Registrar was directed to temporarily release the lower court file to the court below for execution of the decree.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The Deputy Registrar is directed to temporarily release the lower court file to the court below for purposes of execution of the decree.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MURANG’A
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2019
MICHAEL MWANGI GUCHURA.....APPELLANT
VERSUS
MARTIN WAMBUA KITAVI...........RESPONDENT
RULING NO. 2
1. The respondent seeks temporary release of the lower court file to enable him execute the decree. He avers that that he cannot reap the fruits of his judgment yet there is no stay.
2. Those matters are pleaded in a notice of motion dated 9th December 2019 and the annexed deposition sworn by his counsel on even date.
3. The application is contested by the appellant. There are grounds of opposition dated 14th July 2020; and, a replying affidavit sworn on 20th January 2020.
4. The respondent argues that the more just course would be to determine the appeal on the merits instead of moving the lower court file back and forth. He contends that his appeal raises serious grounds which will be defeated by the hurried execution. He further deposes that the Policyholders Compensation Fund has extended the declaration of moratorium of payments by his insurer, United Insurance Company Limited (annexture MM1).
5. On 21st July 2020, I heard brief submissions from learned counsel for both parties.
6. The respondent is the legal representative of Kambua Kitavi (deceased) who perished in a road traffic accident on 24th September 2003. On 25th May 2005, the lower court awarded the estate Kshs 536,025 in damages plus costs and interest.
7. The appellant’s motion for stay of execution pending appeal was dismissed by the High Court in a ruling delivered on 8th October 2019. As far as I can tell from the record, the appellant has neither filed an appeal nor sought any review of that order.
8. The respondent cannot obviously execute the decree because the original lower court file is before this court. True, the main appeal is arguable and remains unheard. But in the absence of a stay, there would be no valid reason to bar the respondent from executing the decree. Paraphrased, it would allow the appellant to continue to enjoy a fictitious reprieve.
9. In the end I direct the Deputy Registrar to temporarily release the lower court file to the court below for purposes of execution of the decree.
10. I make no order on costs.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNEDandDELIVEREDat MURANG’Athis 24th day of September 2020.
KANYI KIMONDO
JUDGE
Ruling read in open court in the presence of:
No appearance by counsel for the appellant.
No appearance by counsel for the respondent.
Ms. Dorcas Waichuhi & Ms. Susan Waiganjo, Court Assistants.