[2021] KECA 833 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the order sought to be stayed was a negative order, namely, the dismissal of the applicant's application for stay of execution by the High Court. Such an order does not require any positive act and is incapable of execution, and therefore cannot be stayed. The Court further noted that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KECA 833 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Mwangi Guchura; Respondent: Martin Wambua Kitavi (Legal Representative of Kambua Kitavi, deceased)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 167 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Judges
- FI Koome, AK Murgor
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Negative Orders, Appellate Jurisdiction, Enforcement of Judgments
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Mwangi Guchura
Applicant
Martin Wambua Kitavi (Legal Representative of Kambua Kitavi, deceased)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal can grant a stay of execution against a negative order dismissing an application for stay of execution.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution pending appeal in the absence of a notice of appeal against the trial court's decree.
- 3 Whether the existence of a pending appeal in the High Court precludes the Court of Appeal from granting a stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the order sought to be stayed was a negative order, namely, the dismissal of the applicant's application for stay of execution by the High Court. Such an order does not require any positive act and is incapable of execution, and therefore cannot be stayed. The Court further noted that there was no notice of appeal against the decree of the trial court, and that an appeal against that decree was already pending before the High Court. Consequently, the Court of Appeal found no merit in the application for stay and dismissed it with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NYERI
(CORAM: KOOME, M’INOTI & MURGOR, JJ.A.)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NYR 167 OF 2018
BETWEEN
MICHAEL MWANGI GUCHURA......................................................................APPLICANT
AND
MARTIN WAMBUA KITAVI Legal Representative of
KAMBUA KITAVI (DECEASED)..................................................................RESPONDENT
(Application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of an intended
appeal against the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya at Murang’a
(Kimondo, J.) dated 8th October 2019
in
HCCA No. 18 of 2019)
******************
RULING OF THE COURT
The respondent, Martin Wambua Kitavi, suing on behalf of Kambua Kitavi (deceased), obtained a judgment ofKshs 536, 025together with interest, againstthe respondent, Michael Mwangi Guchura, in theChief Magistrates Court at Murang’a. The respondent’s cause of action was based on a motor accident in which the deceased died.
The trial court granted the applicant stay of execution conditional upon deposit of the decretal amount in court. The respondent did not meet the condition and on 13th May 2019 the trial court extended the time to comply with 45 days, failing which the stay of execution would abate. The applicant was aggrieved and moved to the High Court on 26th June 2019 seeking an order for stay of execution of the judgment of the trial court. His main contention in the High Court was that he was a pensioner and unable to pay the decretal amount, the respondent was obliged to exhaust all other recovery avenues before seeking to commit the applicant to civil jail, and that the decree was time-barred under the Limitations of Actions Act.
Kimondo, J.dismissed the application on 8th October 2019 after finding that the applicant had not provided the details of his income and that he had in fact agreed before the trial court to deposit the decretal amount within 45 days.
After filing a notice of appeal on 18th October 2019, the applicant lodged the motion now before us in which he seeks stay of the ruling and order by the High Court dated 8th October 2019.
Other than the fact that the intended appeal is against exercise of discretion by the High Court which this Court will not readily interfere with, it is plainly obvious to us that the order which the applicant seeks to stay, and the subject of his notice of appeal, merely dismissed his application for stay of execution of the judgment and decree of the trial court. That order per se is a negative order that is incapable of being executed and therefore being stayed. This Court has stated severally that it cannot stay a negative order. (See Western College of Arts & Applied Sciences v. Oranga & Others[1976] KLR 6, Executive Estates Ltd v. Kenya Posts & Another [2005] 1 E.A. 53, Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltdv. Banking Insurance & Finance Union (Kenya)[2015] eKLR, Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd v. Tamarind MeadowsLtd & 7 Others[2016] eKLR, and Kaushik Panchamatia & 3 Others v. Prime Bank Ltd & Another[2020] eKLR).
We also cannot be asked to stay the decree of the trial court in the circumstances of this application, firstly, because as of now, we have no notice of appeal against that decree, and secondly, there is an appeal against that decree pending for hearing and determination before the High Court.
For the foregoing reasons, we find no merit in this application and the same is hereby dismissed with costs to the respondent.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
M. K. KOOME
....................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
K. M’INOTI
..................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A. K. MURGOR
....................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR