[1998] KEHC 196 (KLR)
The court found that the first defendant, as the driver, owed a duty of care to the plaintiff and was negligent in the manner he drove the tractor, causing the plaintiff to fall and sustain injuries. However, the plaintiff was also found to have contributed to the accident by failing to hold onto the trailer, which...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] KEHC 196 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Michael Njenga Kimani; Defendant: Stephen Njoroge Kariuki; Defendant: Kiambu Municipal Council
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 4495 of 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff against both defendants jointly and severally for reduced damages due to contributory negligence
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Vicarious Liability, Contributory Negligence, Personal Injury, Damages Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Njenga Kimani
Plaintiff
Stephen Njoroge Kariuki
Defendant
Kiambu Municipal Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first defendant was negligent in causing the accident resulting in the plaintiff's injuries.
- 2 Whether the second defendant is vicariously liable for the acts of the first defendant.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff contributed to his own injuries through negligence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the first defendant, as the driver, owed a duty of care to the plaintiff and was negligent in the manner he drove the tractor, causing the plaintiff to fall and sustain injuries. However, the plaintiff was also found to have contributed to the accident by failing to hold onto the trailer, which had rails or sides. In the absence of independent evidence, the court apportioned liability equally between the plaintiff and the first defendant, making the second defendant vicariously liable to the same extent. The court assessed general damages at Kshs.150,000, reduced by 50% for contributory negligence, and special damages at Kshs.700, also reduced by 50%. The judgment was...
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff against both defendants jointly and severally for reduced damages due to contributory negligence
Orders
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the two defendants jointly and severally in the sum of Kshs.75,000 general damages.
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the two defendants jointly and severally in the sum of Kshs.350 special damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL CASE NO. 4495 OF 1986
MICHAEL NJENGA KIMANI……………………………PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
STEPHEN NJOROGE KARIUKI……………………..1ST DEFENDANT
KIAMBU MUNICIPAL COUNCIL………………….2ND DEFENDANT
JUDGEMENT
The Plaintiff was involved in an accident on 20th June, 1986 at a place called Kangoya in Kiambu. The plaintiff was then an employee of the second Defendant as a cleaner and on the said day he was a passenger in a tractor Registration No.KRE 828 owned by the second defendant and driven by the first defendant.
As a result of the said accident, the Plaintiff sustained injuries and this suit is for damages for the injuries so sustained. In his pleadings he blamed the accident on the negligence of the first defendant. As the first defendant was an employee of the second defendant, the plaintiff pleads vicarious liability.
The defendants denied that the accident was caused as a result of the negligence of the first defendant. While admitting that the said accident took place, they attributed the injuries sustained by the plaintiff to his own negligence. In the alternative contributory negligence is pleaded on the part of the Plaintiff.
In respect of damages claimed, the defendants pleaded that, other than workmen’s compensation, the plaintiff was not entitled to any other compensation.
It is the plaintiffs case that the first defendant braked suddenly, cause the tractor to jerk and then he (the plaintiff) fell off from the trailer in which he was riding. He also alleged that the tractor was fast at the time of the accident. He denied that he jumped off the tractor.
Both DW1 AND DW2 did not know what caused the plaintiff to fall off the tractor. They have said as much in their respective testimonies.
Whereas the plaintiff said that the trailer had no rails, the driver, DW1 said they were there. DW2 also said the Plaintiff could have held onto the body of the trailer. I note that the trailer was used to carry refuse. I cannot envisage the trailer being flat without the sides raised to hold the refuse collected. If the plaintiff did not hold the rails or the body he was in my judgment negligent.
The driver, DW1 owed a duty of care to all those he carried. The version given by the plaintiff as to the occurrence though denied appears possible. In any case, the first defendant was in control of the tractor and hence cannot shift total blame onto the plaintiff. I find he was negligent but that the plaintiff must have contributed substantially to the accident in failing to hold onto the trailer firmly to avoid falling off.
In the absence of independent evidence, I shall as I hereby do, apportion liability equally between the plaintiff and the first defendant. And so the first defendant shall be liable to the plaintiff to the extent of 50%. Vicarious liability has not been denied and so the second defendant is liable to the same extent as that of the first defendant.
On quantum, the plaintiff produce the medical report, Ext 1. He sustained bruising of the head, the front of the chest, pelvis, lower back and right leg and foot. He also had lacerations of the face, right side of the shoulder and of both legs. He remained with some scars of permanent nature. He had been admitted to Kiambu General Hospital for one day.
Two cases have been cited by the learned counsel for the plaintiff.
These are HCCC No.2707 of 1990 Danye Mabwaka Khabwai vs. Mawingo Bus Services Ltd and HCCC No.3854 of 1986 Joyce Wanjiru vs. Dancan Manza Gicheru & Another.
I have looked at those cases and the awards made for injuries sustained. In my judgement, general damages on 100% basis in the instant case should be Kshs.150,000/=. This shall be reduced by 50% contributory negligence leaving a balance of Kshs.75,000/=. The plaintiff was not paid any compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act otherwise such a payment would be deducted from this award.
Special damages for the police accident abstract and the medical report amount to Kshs.100/= and 600/= respectively. The total of Kshs.700/= is also subject to contributory negligence leaving a balance of Kshs.350/=.
In the end there shall be judgement for the plaintiff against the two defendants jointly and severally in the sum of kshs.75,000/= general damages, Kshs.350/= special damages plus costs and interest at court rates.
Orders accordingly.
Dated at Nairobi this 15th Day of July, 1998
MBOGHOLI MSAGHA
JUDGE
Gitau for Mwangi for Plaintiff.
Namada for Ogutu for Defendant.