[2012] KEHC 3614 (KLR)
The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee acted in excess of their jurisdiction by purporting to cancel the appellant's title to registered land and ordering its transfer to the respondents. The Tribunal's jurisdiction is limited by section 3(1) of the Land...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 3614 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael Otengo Wesonga; Respondent: Rajab Opuya Baraza; Respondent: Ibrahim M. Baraza; Respondent: Shaban Baraza
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 51 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Registered Land Title, First Registration Protection, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Otengo Wesonga
Appellant
Rajab Opuya Baraza
Respondent
Ibrahim M. Baraza
Respondent
Shaban Baraza
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal and Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee had jurisdiction to determine disputes relating to title and ownership of registered land.
- 2 Whether the orders made by the Tribunal and Appeals Committee affecting registered land were valid.
- 3 Whether the appellant's long occupation and first registration status protected his title from alteration or cancellation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee acted in excess of their jurisdiction by purporting to cancel the appellant's title to registered land and ordering its transfer to the respondents. The Tribunal's jurisdiction is limited by section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act to matters involving division, boundary determination, occupation, or trespass, and does not extend to ownership or title of registered land. The orders made by both the Tribunal and the Appeals Committee were therefore nullities. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned decisions were set aside.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The orders of the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee and the Navakholo Land Disputes Tribunal are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
CIVIL APPEAL 51 OF 2008
(An appeal from the decision and/or order of the LAND
PROVINCIAL DISPUTES APPEALS COMMITTEE vide Appeal
No. 15 of 2006 read and made known to the parties on 12th June, 2008)
BETWEEN
MICHAEL OTENGO WESONGA ......................................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
1. RAJAB OPUYA BARAZA
2. IBRAHIM M. BARAZA
3. SHABAN BARAZA......................................................................................ESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The Appeal herein is premised on the following grounds:-
1. The Provincial Land Disputes Appeal Committee and the Land Disputes Tribunal have no jurisdiction to determine disputes on the ownership and title to land registered under the Registered Act.
2. The Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee failed to consider and evaluate the fact that the appellant acquired the land in dispute i.e. Land Parcel No. Bunyala/Budonga/738over 40 years ago and that this is registered land held as a first registration that cannot be altered or cancelled under section 143 of the Registered Land Act.
3. The Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee failed to appreciate the fact that the appellant bought the land in dispute in 1967 from the father of the respondents the late Mzee Baraza Wakhulunya for Kshs.5,000/= who got the Land Registration in his own name as a first Registration.
4. That the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee failed to consider the fact that the appellant has stayed on the land for more than 40 years and cannot now be removed as he is the owner of the said land since Land Adjudication and Registration thereof.
5. That the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee failed to appreciate that the appellant failed to trace the sale agreement between him and the respondent’s father due to lapse of time which is more than 40 years since.
6. That the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee has no jurisdiction to make orders affecting title of Registered Land and therefore they exceeded their powers under the law.
The firm of Omukunda & Co. Advocates appeared for the appellant. The Respondents appeared in person.
The Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee made the following orders:-
“1. The appeal is dismissed with costs.
2. That Nabakholo Land Disputes Tribunal Elders Court ruling stands and should now be implemented accordingly.
3. The parties to keep peace.”
The Navakkholo Land Disputes Tribunal made the following orders:-
“1. Land No. BUDONGA/BUNYALA/738 be cancelled by theHigh Court Order and the names of the complainants bereplaced as owners.
2. The land Registrar be ordered to register this land into the names of the complainants.
3. The objector to pay all costs of this land case to the complainant.”
The jurisdiction of the Land Disputes is set out in section 3 (1) of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act No. 18 of 1990 which stipulates as follows:-
“Subject to this Act, all cases of a civil nature involving a dispute as to –
(a)The division of, or the determination of boundaies to land, including land held in common;
(b)A claim to occupy or work land; or
(c)Tresspass to land.
Shall be heard and determined by a Tribunal established under section 4. ”
The Tribunal therefore lacked the jurisdiction to cancel any title Deed. The Tribunal therefore acted in excess of jurisdiction and its declaration was a nullity. The Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee’s decision to uphold the decision of the Navakholo Land Disputes Tribunal is equally a nullity on this ground alone. The appeal has merits and is allowed. The orders of the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee and that of the Navakholo Land Disputes Tribunal are hereby set aside.
Each party to meet own costs.
Delivered, dated and signed in open court at Kakamega this 21st day of June, 2012
B. THURANIRA JADEN
J U D G E