[2011] KECA 30 (KLR)

[2011] KECA 30 (KLR)

The Court held that the applicant's request for extension of time to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal was premature and superfluous because he did not have leave to appeal, which was a prerequisite for the intended appeal. The High Court had already declined to grant leave, and the applicant neither...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] KECA 30 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Michael Wachira Gakuo; Respondent: Elizabeth Wamuyu Githinji
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 71 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Wachira Gakuo

Applicant

Elizabeth Wamuyu Githinji

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an extension of time to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the application is premature in the absence of leave to appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the applicant's request for extension of time to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal was premature and superfluous because he did not have leave to appeal, which was a prerequisite for the intended appeal. The High Court had already declined to grant leave, and the applicant neither appealed that refusal nor sought leave from the Court of Appeal under the relevant rules. Without leave, there was no right of appeal, and thus no basis for granting an extension of time. The application was therefore dismissed as incompetent.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time is dismissed.