[2019] KEHC 4498 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 4498 (KLR)

The court found that Section 25(2) of the Penal Code, under which the 5th appellant was sentenced, is unconstitutional. In light of this, and considering the submissions by the prosecution that the time already served by the 5th appellant is adequate punishment, the court determined that it would be just to sentence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 4498 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Micheal Musungu; Appellant: Alex Navulu; Appellant: Joseph Indambo; Appellant: Alfred Juma; Appellant: IA; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 33 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Sentencing and Release of Minor Appellant
Outcome
5th appellant resentenced to time served and ordered released; judgment for 1st to 4th appellants reserved.
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Sentencing of Minors, Constitutionality of Penal Code Provisions, Release of Prisoners, Juvenile Justice
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing of Minors Constitutionality of Penal Code Provisions Release of Prisoners Juvenile Justice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Micheal Musungu

Appellant

Alex Navulu

Appellant

Joseph Indambo

Appellant

Alfred Juma

Appellant

IA

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Sentencing and Release of Minor Appellant

  1. 1 Whether Section 25(2) of the Penal Code is constitutional as applied to minors.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate sentence for a minor previously sentenced under Section 25(2) of the Penal Code after its declaration of unconstitutionality.
  3. 3 Whether the time already served by the 5th appellant is adequate punishment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Section 25(2) of the Penal Code, under which the 5th appellant was sentenced, is unconstitutional. In light of this, and considering the submissions by the prosecution that the time already served by the 5th appellant is adequate punishment, the court determined that it would be just to sentence the 5th appellant to a period equivalent to the time already served. Consequently, the 5th appellant is to be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. This approach aligns with constitutional protections for minors and the principle that no person should be detained under an unconstitutional law.

Court Disposition

5th appellant resentenced to time served and ordered released; judgment for 1st to 4th appellants reserved.

Orders

  • Judgment for 1st to 4th appellants to be delivered on 25th October, 2019.
  • 5th appellant IA is sentenced to a period equivalent to time already served.