[2017] KEELC 19 (KLR)
The plaintiff proved that he entered into a valid sale agreement with the defendant for LR No. 21/1/37, paid the full purchase price, and executed the indenture. The defendant failed to sign the indenture and did not contest the suit. The court found that damages would be inadequate for breach of contract for sale...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 19 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Micheal Mwangi Njoroge; Defendant: Emmanuel Dee
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 35 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Formal Proof Judgment After Default
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff.
- Judges
- LC Komingoi
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Sale of Land, Title Registration, Mandatory Injunction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Micheal Mwangi Njoroge
Plaintiff
Emmanuel Dee
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Formal Proof Judgment After Default
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement for LR No. 21/1/37.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff should be registered as the owner of the suit property.
- 3 Whether a mandatory injunction should issue to compel the Land Registrar to reconstruct the register and register the plaintiff as owner.
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff proved that he entered into a valid sale agreement with the defendant for LR No. 21/1/37, paid the full purchase price, and executed the indenture. The defendant failed to sign the indenture and did not contest the suit. The court found that damages would be inadequate for breach of contract for sale of land and that the plaintiff had performed his part of the bargain. Applying the principles in Manzoor v Baram and Aziz v Bhatia Brothers Limited, the court held that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance, a mandatory injunction to reconstruct the register, and registration as owner of the suit property. The plaintiff was also awarded costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Orders
- Declaration that the plaintiff is the purchaser and owner of LR No. 21/1/37 as described in the indenture dated 20th November 1952.
- Mandatory injunction directing the Land Registrar to reconstruct the register for LR No. 21/1/37.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CIVIL SUIT NO 35 OF 2017
MICHEAL MWANGI NJOROGE ........................... PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
EMMANUEL DEE ................................................ DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
1. The Plaintiff has filed this suit against the Defendant seeking;
a) That the Plaintiff is the purchaser and owner of Reference number 21/1/37 being the premises in and conveyed by an indenture dated 20th day of November 1952 registered in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890 which said parcel of land is more particularly delineated and described on plan number 49081 annexed thereto and thereto bordered red (hereinafter referred to as land registered as aforesaid in Volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890) and thereon bordered red together with the buildings and improvements erected thereon.
b) A mandatory injunction or order directed at the Land Registrar to reconstruct the Register on Land Reference 21/1/37 being the premises in and conveyed by an indenture dated 20th day of November 1952 registered in Volume N 38 Folio 144/1 File 11890 which said piece of parcel of land is more particularly delineated and described on plan Number 49081 annexed thereto and thereto bordered red (herein after referred to as the land registered as aforesaid in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890) and thereon bordered red together with the buildings and improvements erected thereon.
c) That the Plaintiff Micheal Mwangi Njoroge be registered by the Land Registrar as the purchaser and owner of the land reference number 21/1/37 being the premises in and conveyed by an indenture dated 20th November 1952 registered in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890 which said piece or said parcel of land in more particularly delineated and described on plan number 49081 annexed thereto and thereto bordered red hereinafter referred to as the Land Registered as aforesaid in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890) and thereon bordered red together with the buildings and improvements erected thereon.
d) Costs of this suit.
2. The Defendant who was duly served with copies of plaint and summons to enter appearance neglected to enter appearance and/or file defence with the stipulated period. Interlocutory judgment was then entered. The matter was thereafter set down for formal proof.
3. It is the Plaintiff’s case that he entered into an agreement with the Defendant to purchase the Defendant’s interest in LR No. 21/1/37 by virtue of an indenture registered in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890.
4. That the Plaintiff paid Kshs18,000,000/= and an indenture was drawn by M/s J.K. Muchai And Company Advocates. The Plaintiff signed by the Defendant refused to sign his part and has been evasive to date. The Plaintiff prays that the Defendant be compelled to sign the indenture.
5. I have considered the pleadings and the submissions by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff’s case is uncontroverted. He produced the agreement of sale as exhibit P1. The same is dated 23rd October 2016. It is drawn by J.K. Muchai And Company Advocates.
He also produced the indenture as exhibit P2. The same is signed by the transferee only. The Defendant who is the transfer or has not signed. The Plaintiff also produced two cash transfer forms as exhibits P3 a, 7 b respectively.
6. I am satisfied that the Plaintiff has made out a good case against the Defendant. I find that the Plaintiff has performed his part of the bargain.
I rely on the case of Manzoor –versus- Baram (2003) EA page 580 and Aziz –versus- Bhatia Brothers Limited (2001) EA where it was stated that for a party to be granted an order of specific performance he must show that;
i) Damages are an inadequate remedy for breach of contract for sale of land.
ii) He has performed his part of the bargain and as such he may be assisted by the court to enforce the contract against the defaulting party.
7. Accordingly, I enter judgment for the Plaintiff as against the Defendant as follows;
a) A declaration is hereby issued that the Plaintiff is the purchaser and owner of land reference number 21/1/37 being the premises in and conveyed by an indenture dated 20th day of November 1952 registered in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890 which said parcel of land is more particularly delineated and described on plan number 49081 annexed thereto and thereto bordered red (hereinafter referred to as land registered as aforesaid in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890) and thereon bordered red together with the buildings and improvements erected thereon.
b) A mandatory injunction be and is hereby issued directing the Land Registrar to construct the register on land reference 21/1/37 being the premises in and conveyed by an indenture dated 20th day of November 1952 registered in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890 which said piece of parcel of land is more particularly delineated and described on plan number 49081 annexed thereto and bordered red (hereinafter referred to as the land registered as aforesaid in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890) and therein bordered red together with eh buildings and improvements erected thereon.
c) That the Plaintiff Micheal Mwangi Njoroge be registered by the land registrar as the purchaser and owner of land reference number 21/1/37 being the premises in and conveyed by an indenture dated 20th November 1952 registered in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890 which said piece of parcel of land is more particularly delineated and described in plan number 49081 annexed thereto and thereto bordered red (hereinafter refereed to as land registered as aforesaid in volume N38 Folio 144/1 File 11890) and thereon bordered red together with the buildings and improvements erected thereon.
d) The plaintiff shall have costs of this suit.
It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered at Mombasa on the 9th day of November 2017.
L. KOMINGOI
JUDGE
9/11/2017