[2023] KEELC 20937 (KLR)
The court found that while the right to privacy protects personal information, including tax details, this right is not absolute and may be limited where there is a lawful justification. In this case, the Plaintiff required the 5th Defendant's KRA PIN solely to execute a court judgment by paying the requisite stamp...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 20937 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Stanley Michieka; Defendant: James Davidson Gikandi; Defendant: Mrs Helena Gikandi; Defendant: Thome Farmers No.5 Limited; Defendant: Vema Agencies Limited; Defendant: Joreth Limited; Defendant: Kimani Kahiro & Co Advocates; Defendant: Chege Wainaina t/a Chege Wainaina & Co Advocates; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 446 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Disclosure of Tax Information
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- LN Mbugua
- Legal Topics
- Stamp Duty Payment, Execution of Judgment, Taxpayer Information Disclosure, Privacy Rights, Data Protection, Land Transfer
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stanley Michieka
Plaintiff
James Davidson Gikandi
Defendant
Mrs Helena Gikandi
Defendant
Thome Farmers No.5 Limited
Defendant
Vema Agencies Limited
Defendant
Joreth Limited
Defendant
Kimani Kahiro & Co Advocates
Defendant
Chege Wainaina t/a Chege Wainaina & Co Advocates
Defendant
Kenya Revenue Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Disclosure of Tax Information
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should compel the Kenya Revenue Authority to disclose the 5th Defendant's KRA PIN to facilitate payment of stamp duty for transfer of land LR 13330/234.
- 2 Whether the right to privacy under Article 31 of the Constitution precludes such disclosure in the context of executing a court judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the right to privacy protects personal information, including tax details, this right is not absolute and may be limited where there is a lawful justification. In this case, the Plaintiff required the 5th Defendant's KRA PIN solely to execute a court judgment by paying the requisite stamp duty for the transfer of land. Section 6(2) of the Tax Procedures Act, 2015, expressly permits the Kenya Revenue Authority to disclose taxpayer information upon a court order. The Data Protection Act also exempts such disclosure where required by law or court order. The court held that the need to execute its judgment constituted a legitimate and lawful purpose, justifying the...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Kenya Revenue Authority is compelled to disclose and/or provide to the Plaintiff the Personal Identification Number (PIN) of the 5th Defendant for purposes of processing and/or generating a KRA e-payment slip in respect of stamp duty payable for transfer of LR 13330/234.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
Michieka v Gikandi & 6 others; Kenya Revenue Authority (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 446 of 2013) [2023] KEELC 20937 (KLR) (19 October 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 20937 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 446 of 2013
LN Mbugua, J
October 19, 2023
Between
Stanley Michieka
Plaintiff
and
James Davidson Gikandi
1st Defendant
Mrs Helena Gikandi
2nd Defendant
Thome Farmers No.5 Limited
3rd Defendant
Vema Agencies Limited
4th Defendant
Joreth Limited
5th Defendant
Kimani Kahiro & Co Advocates
6th Defendant
Chege Wainaina t/a Chege Wainaina & Co Advocates
7th Defendant
and
Kenya Revenue Authority
Interested Party
Ruling
1. The Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion application dated 8. 3.2023 is for determination. He seeks orders to compel the Interested Party to disclose and or provide to him the Personal Identification Number (PIN) of the 5th Defendant for purposes of processing and or generating a KRA e-payment slip in respect of stamp duty payable for transfer of the parcel of land known as LR 13330/234.
2. The applicant avers that pursuant to the decree herein and subsequent order dated 3. 6.2022, a transfer was executed and the amount of stamp duty payable for the said transfer was assessed at a sum of ksh.1,440,000/=.
3. That owing to the e-tax payment system at Kenya Revenue Authority which requires input of PIN numbers of the respective parties to a conveyance for purposes of generating KRA payment slip, they have been unable to generate a slip because they do not have a PIN number for the 5th Defendant.
4. That by a letter dated 20. 1.2023, his Advocates requested the interested Party to allow them to disclose the Pin number of the 5th Defendant, but they advised that he has to obtain a court order to that effect.
5. The Plaintiff filed submissions dated 14. 9.2023 which I have duly considered. It is submitted that pursuant to Section 6 (2) of the Tax Procedures Act 2015, the interested party may disclose the 5th Defendant’s KRA PIN upon an order of the court.
6. The Plaintiff urges the court to issue the orders sought, given that the purposes of disclosure of the information is solely to enable the Plaintiff to execute the judgement of this court by paying stamp duty.
7. I note that no responses were filed in opposition to the application. In particular, it is noted that one M/S Wambui appeared before this court on 13. 7.2023 and sought 21 days to file a response, of which their request was granted. However, there was no compliance with the said directions.
8. The Plaintiff is unable to execute a judgement delivered by this court on 13. 5.2019 for lack of the 5th Defendant’s KRA PIN number. The provisions of Article 31 of the Constitution stipulate that every person has the right to privacy, which includes the right not to have information relating to their family or private affairs unnecessarily required. Information relating to tax matters is private.
9. However, the said right to privacy must come with certain restrictions so long as there is justification of the law. Section 51 2(c) of the Data Protection Act exempts processing of personal data where disclosure is required by or under any written law or by an order of the court.
10. The 5th Defendant’s KRA PIN is required for a legal purpose which is to execute the judgement of this court. This is a genuine need which, under Section 6 (2) of the Tax Procedures Act, 2015, the Interested Party can provide the said information.
11. In the circumstances, the application is found to have merits, the same is allowed as drawn.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 19THDAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS.LUCY N. MBUGUAJUDGEIn the presence of:-M/s Mukebi holding brief for Muheo for Plaintiff ApplicantsOnyango holding brief for Muheno for 3rd Party (K.R.A)Court Assistant: Eddel