[2023] KEELC 20937 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 20937 (KLR)

The court found that while the right to privacy protects personal information, including tax details, this right is not absolute and may be limited where there is a lawful justification. In this case, the Plaintiff required the 5th Defendant's KRA PIN solely to execute a court judgment by paying the requisite stamp...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 20937 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Stanley Michieka; Defendant: James Davidson Gikandi; Defendant: Mrs Helena Gikandi; Defendant: Thome Farmers No.5 Limited; Defendant: Vema Agencies Limited; Defendant: Joreth Limited; Defendant: Kimani Kahiro & Co Advocates; Defendant: Chege Wainaina t/a Chege Wainaina & Co Advocates; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 446 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Disclosure of Tax Information
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Stamp Duty Payment, Execution of Judgment, Taxpayer Information Disclosure, Privacy Rights, Data Protection, Land Transfer
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Stamp Duty Payment Execution of Judgment Taxpayer Information Disclosure Privacy Rights Data Protection Land Transfer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stanley Michieka

Plaintiff

James Davidson Gikandi

Defendant

Mrs Helena Gikandi

Defendant

Thome Farmers No.5 Limited

Defendant

Vema Agencies Limited

Defendant

Joreth Limited

Defendant

Kimani Kahiro & Co Advocates

Defendant

Chege Wainaina t/a Chege Wainaina & Co Advocates

Defendant

Kenya Revenue Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Disclosure of Tax Information

  1. 1 Whether the court should compel the Kenya Revenue Authority to disclose the 5th Defendant's KRA PIN to facilitate payment of stamp duty for transfer of land LR 13330/234.
  2. 2 Whether the right to privacy under Article 31 of the Constitution precludes such disclosure in the context of executing a court judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the right to privacy protects personal information, including tax details, this right is not absolute and may be limited where there is a lawful justification. In this case, the Plaintiff required the 5th Defendant's KRA PIN solely to execute a court judgment by paying the requisite stamp duty for the transfer of land. Section 6(2) of the Tax Procedures Act, 2015, expressly permits the Kenya Revenue Authority to disclose taxpayer information upon a court order. The Data Protection Act also exempts such disclosure where required by law or court order. The court held that the need to execute its judgment constituted a legitimate and lawful purpose, justifying the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Kenya Revenue Authority is compelled to disclose and/or provide to the Plaintiff the Personal Identification Number (PIN) of the 5th Defendant for purposes of processing and/or generating a KRA e-payment slip in respect of stamp duty payable for transfer of LR 13330/234.