[2007] KEHC 3546 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 3546 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff's claim was a liquidated demand supported by documentary evidence, and that the defendant, having failed to file an amended defence or respond to the application, had not raised any triable issue. The defence on record was a general denial and did not address the amended plaint. The court held that the requirements for striking out the defence and entering summary judgment were met, as the defendant had not demonstrated any arguable defence or reason to be granted leave to defend. Accordingly, the court struck out the defence and entered summary judgment for the plaintiff as prayed in the amended plaint.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 3546 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Microlan (K) Limited; Defendant: Network Technics & Systems Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
31 August 2007
Case Number
Civil Case 270 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Summary Judgment and Striking Out Defence
Outcome
application allowed; defence struck out; summary judgment entered for plaintiff
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Striking Out Defence, Liquidated Claims, Goods Sold and Delivered
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Summary Judgment Striking Out Defence Liquidated Claims Goods Sold and Delivered

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Microlan (K) Limited

Plaintiff

Network Technics & Systems Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Summary Judgment and Striking Out Defence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's defence should be struck out for being scandalous, frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of the court process.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for the sum claimed in the amended plaint.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's claim was a liquidated demand supported by documentary evidence, and that the defendant, having failed to file an amended defence or respond to the application, had not raised any triable issue. The defence on record was a general denial and did not address the amended plaint. The court held that the requirements for striking out the defence and entering summary judgment were met, as the defendant had not demonstrated any arguable defence or reason to be granted leave to defend. Accordingly, the court struck out the defence and entered summary judgment for the plaintiff as prayed in the amended plaint.

Court Disposition

application allowed; defence struck out; summary judgment entered for plaintiff

Orders

  • The defendant's defence dated 18th August, 2005 is struck out.
  • Summary judgment is entered for the plaintiff for the sum claimed in the amended plaint dated 24th November, 2005.