[2018] KEHC 8975 (KLR)
The court found that the Police, specifically the Inspector General and the Director of Criminal Investigations, had failed to comply with clear and repeated court orders to release the Applicant on bond and to produce him before the court. This non-compliance amounted to contempt of court and a violation of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 8975 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Miguna Miguna; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application 57 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Enforcement of Release Order and Contempt
- Outcome
- Orders issued for personal appearance of Inspector General of Police and Director of Criminal Investigations to show cause for contempt and to produce the Applicant in court.
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Right to Fair Trial, Pretrial Release, Contempt of Court, Arrest and Detention
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miguna Miguna
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Enforcement of Release Order and Contempt
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the continued detention of the Applicant by the Police after a court order for release constitutes contempt of court.
- 2 Whether the Applicant's constitutional rights under Articles 25 and 49(1) have been violated by the Police.
- 3 Whether the Inspector General of Police and Director of Criminal Investigations should be compelled to appear before court for contempt.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Police, specifically the Inspector General and the Director of Criminal Investigations, had failed to comply with clear and repeated court orders to release the Applicant on bond and to produce him before the court. This non-compliance amounted to contempt of court and a violation of the Applicant's constitutional rights under Articles 25 and 49(1) of the Constitution. The court emphasized that these rights are non-derogable and cannot be limited under any circumstances. To enforce compliance and uphold the rule of law, the court ordered the responsible officers to appear personally and show cause why they should not be punished for contempt, and to produce the...
Court Disposition
Orders issued for personal appearance of Inspector General of Police and Director of Criminal Investigations to show cause for contempt and to produce the Applicant in court.
Orders
- Inspector General of Police, Mr. Joseph Boinnet, and Director of Criminal Investigations, Mr. George Kinoti, to appear before court personally to show cause why they should not be punished for contempt of court.
- Inspector General of Police and Director of Criminal Investigations to personally produce the Applicant, Miguna Miguna, before court on 6th February 2018 at 9.00 a.m.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
12 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.57 OF 2018
MIGUNA MIGUNA ...................... APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC .............................. RESPONDENT
RULING
On 2nd February 2018, this court (Wakiaga J) ordered the Police to release the Applicant on bond pending his appearance before court today. The Inspector General of Police was served with the order on the same day. The Applicant was not released from Police custody. This morning (5th February,2018) this court again, reiterated the order issued by the court on 2nd February2018. It directed that the Applicant be produced before this court by 2. 00 p.m. today. This order, sadly, again, has not been complied with. It is apparent that the Inspector General of Police and the Director Criminal Investigation are in contempt of the orders of this court. Article 49(1) of the Constitution sets out certain non-derogable rights in relation to an arrested person. That right includes the right for an arrested person to be produced in court within 24 hours of his arrest to be charged or in the alternative he be released. Article 25 (c) of the Constitution declares that the right to fair trial is one of those rights that may not be limited in any way. Another right which cannot be limited is the right not to be subjected or the freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (Article 25(a)). From the submission presented before this court, it appears that the Police, in detaining the Applicant, are operating outside the Constitution and the law. In the circumstances therefore, to remedy the situation, this court orders the Inspector General of Police, Mr. Joseph Boinnet and the Director of Criminal Investigations, Mr. George Kinoti to appear before this court personally to show cause why they should not be punished for being in contempt of the order of this court. They are further ordered to personally produce the Applicant, Miguna Miguna before this court so that he can be dealt with in accordance with the law. This appearance shall be made on 6th February 2018 at 9. 00 a.m. The Director of Public Prosecution to serve the order of this court. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018
L. KIMARU
JUDGE