[2024] KEHC 1978 (KLR)
The court found that while the original sentence of twenty five years imprisonment for incest was lawful and reasonable given the seriousness of the offence and the age and relationship of the victim, the appellant's subsequent demonstration of remorse, his family circumstances, and the fact that his family had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 1978 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Richard Kipkoech Milgo alias Osama; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E016 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- sentence reduced
- Judges
- JR Karanja
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Appeals, Incest Offences, Mitigation Factors
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Kipkoech Milgo alias Osama
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of twenty five years imprisonment for incest was harsh and excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the original sentence of twenty five years imprisonment for incest was lawful and reasonable given the seriousness of the offence and the age and relationship of the victim, the appellant's subsequent demonstration of remorse, his family circumstances, and the fact that his family had forgiven him justified a reduction in sentence. The court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence to ten years imprisonment, holding that this was a prudent and proportionate response in the circumstances, especially as the state did not oppose the appeal.
Court Disposition
sentence reduced
Orders
- The sentence of twenty five years imprisonment is set aside and substituted with a sentence of ten years imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Milgo alias Osama v Republic (Criminal Appeal E016 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 1978 (KLR) (29 February 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 1978 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kericho
Criminal Appeal E016 of 2021
JR Karanja, J
February 29, 2024
Between
Richard Kipkoech Milgo alias Osama
Appellant
and
Republic
Respondent
Judgment
1. Although the petition of appeal filed herein on 18th November 2021 alludes to the appeal being on both conviction and sentence, it would appear that the appellant changed his mind by filing amended grounds of appeal on 1st July 2023 thereby abandoning the appeal on conviction and proceeding with the appeal on sentence only. The state/respondent is not opposed to the appeal.
2. An appeal on sentence is premised on the condition that the sentence imposed was unlawful and/or the sentence was too harsh and excessive in the circumstances of the case.
3. Herein, the appellant was charged with incest and sentenced to twenty five years imprisonment. The trial court in passing the sentence considered the appellants mitigating factors and the call by the prosecution to accord the appellant the maximum sentence that there could be i.e life imprisonment for reasons that the victim was aged 12 years old and a biological daughter of the accused/appellant.
4. In mitigation, the appellant did not appear remorseful but asked the court to consider his welfare and that of his children who were in school. Considering the foregoing, the sentence was lawful and reasonable in the circumstances of the case. It is therefore ironic that the state raises no objection to the appeal yet it called for a maximum sentence.
5. Be that as it may, the appellant has informed this court that he is 49 years married with six (6) children who depend on him. He also says that he is remorseful and has since been forgiven by his family. In the circumstances, it would be prudent that the sentence be reduced to ten (10) years imprisonment. The appeal therefore succeeds to that extent.Ordered accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024. J. R KARANJAHJUDGE