[2008] KEHC 3508 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 3508 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the reply to defence, namely the breakdown in communication due to the prevailing political situation. The application was not brought after a long delay, and the defendant, though served, did not oppose the application....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 3508 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Milicons Limited; Defendant: Rajiv Shah t/a Kenyamotor Sports Club
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 580 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Reply to Defence Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
PM Mwilu
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Reply to Defence, Court Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Reply to Defence Court Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Milicons Limited

Plaintiff

Rajiv Shah t/a Kenyamotor Sports Club

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Reply to Defence Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to file a reply to defence out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the reply to defence was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the reply to defence, namely the breakdown in communication due to the prevailing political situation. The application was not brought after a long delay, and the defendant, though served, did not oppose the application. The court exercised its discretion to allow the plaintiff to file the reply to defence out of time, finding that the interests of justice would be served by granting the extension.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the plaintiff to file a reply to defence as per the annexed draft.
  • The reply to defence shall be filed and served within ten (10) days of the date of this ruling.