[2022] KEHC 12708 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 12708 (KLR)

The court found that both the application for revocation of the certificate of confirmation of grant and the preliminary objection thereto were misconceived and incompetent because no formal certificate of confirmation of grant had ever been issued by the court. The parties had proceeded to distribute and transmit...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 12708 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Milka Nabwrie Amukowa; Respondent: Collins Onyango Amukowa; Respondent: Sylvanus Amukhale Amukowa; Respondent: Marydina Namukuru Amukowa; Respondent: Stephene Ombune Amukowa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 62 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
Both the application for revocation of grant and the preliminary objection are dismissed as misconceived and incompetent.
Judges
JR Karanja
Legal Topics
Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Revocation of Grant, Estate Distribution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Confirmation of Grant Revocation of Grant Estate Distribution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Milka Nabwrie Amukowa

Applicant

Collins Onyango Amukowa

Respondent

Sylvanus Amukhale Amukowa

Respondent

Marydina Namukuru Amukowa

Respondent

Stephene Ombune Amukowa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the application for revocation of the certificate of confirmation of grant is competent where no such certificate was ever issued.
  2. 2 Whether the preliminary objection to the application for revocation is itself competent in the absence of a certificate of confirmation of grant.
  3. 3 Whether the distribution and transmission of the estate property without a formal certificate of confirmation of grant is valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both the application for revocation of the certificate of confirmation of grant and the preliminary objection thereto were misconceived and incompetent because no formal certificate of confirmation of grant had ever been issued by the court. The parties had proceeded to distribute and transmit the estate property without the necessary legal instrument, rendering their actions a nullity in law. As there was no certificate to revoke, the application was fundamentally flawed, and the objection equally lacked merit. The court dismissed both the application and the objection, holding that there was nothing left to confirm or revoke due to the passage of time and the estate...

Court Disposition

Both the application for revocation of grant and the preliminary objection are dismissed as misconceived and incompetent.

Orders

  • The application dated September 28, 2020 is dismissed.
  • The preliminary objection dated November 10, 2020 is dismissed.